why is this so? is armour really that worthless compared to resist all
because the modifiers for armor is less important. Your going to stack a lot more armor then resists no matter what. My shield has more armor on it then my highest resist.
If I want a new shield and one has 40 to all resists and 900 armor and the other has 15 to all resists but 1400 armor I am going to get the 40 to all resists because the armor difference is only 500 and I have like like 10k armor (i dont remember I just made that up)
I remember someone saying something along the lines of "1 resist all = 10 armor", which, given the diminishing returns system in place, sounds about right.
So that item with 40 resist all? You could also think of it as having +400 armor. It's a biiig deal.
Also, they stack with each other. Multiplicatively, apparently. So you want as much of both as you can get.
Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.
Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.
Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.