|
|
Just because a group of people use it doesn't mean they suddenly have to support it. I'd imagine they were fine with losing that potential income when they decided not to port it to that specifically in the first place. "We decided to use it even though you told us you wouldn't support it, so now you have to" isn't exactly the basis of a sound argument. |
|
|
Hey, at least you can play in single player offline mod.. oh, wait.
Nevermind. |
What's even stranger is that name of the one of the posters in the WINE thread is the same person that originated both of the threads you linked...... |
Your ban cycle is 30th of every month, yes? I'll just switch over to wine to add 1 more to the testing. |
|
|
We’ve extensively tested for false positive situations, including replicating system setups for those who have posted claiming they were banned unfairly. We’ve not found any situations that could produce a false positive, have found that the circumstances for which they were banned were clear and accurate, and we are extremely confident in our findings. haha so he is reading the forums and ignoring the good post |
|
|
It almost sounds like if you use Linux you are more apt to cheat at D3.
I'd love to know the proportion of Linux users vs. Linux users banned to Windows users vs. windows users banned. |
There are things called replies, quite a few of them state they are banned too. Though multiple fakes is also possible. |
|
Community Manager
|
Oh, well that's helpful. So probably a more isolated situation than it may appear. |
|
|
So... here's what I don't get. Not much. Suppose there is a bug, then what happens when you have a bug you don't want to fix? You tell people that you don't want to fix it. That is fine. What is not fine is, by definition, banning the account only occurs when the user is gaining unfair advantage from the addition software. Apparently a bug in Warden doesn't give the user any advantage. Therefore there is no reason not to restore / refund the players. It is fine for Blizzard to piss off all the Linux users by telling them don't play our games on Linux. It is not fine to ban their account because of Warden has a bug that couldn't decided if a user is playing unfairly. |
I thought you guys acted similarly to how Valve bans players? (Flags accounts that are cheating and then actually activates the bans on a specific interval) |
|
|
news story it hitting the gaming websites worldwide now
http://kotaku.com/5923068/report-blizzard-banning-diablo-iii-players-for-using-linux |
.. what? That's UN-possible -- that might actually make sense. |
|
|
I agree with you. There is no reason for Blizzard to support Linux or Wine.
It is not fine though, to ban the accounts because of using Wine. It is clearly defined that an account would only be banned if the user is gaining advantage from it. In the Linux users' case, the banned accounts are clearly proven not to have gain advantage. As many people would agree this is more of a bug in Warden. Therefore it is wrong to ban these accounts. It is fine not to support Wine. It is not fine to ban users on the wrong grounds. |
Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.
Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.
Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.