Diablo® III

Follow-Up Points

(Locked)

The crazy thing about this whole post is, that with all the complaints about this game, these are the questions they choose to answer??
90 Worgen Death Knight
11100
Selective caring, I guess. :(
90 Worgen Death Knight
11100
What? I'm stilll bumping this thread? Yup.

** http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6079707996?page=33#660 **
90 Worgen Death Knight
11100
Back to the top!

** http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6079707996?page=33#660 **
Why is this not enforced?

http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6080179819

As a reminder, the Trading forum is here to provide a place where players can post “want to sell” (WTS), “want to buy” (WTB), or “price check” threads for their Diablo III loot. Threads of this nature posted outside of the Trading forum may be removed without notice, and may result in a suspension if the post violates Code of Conduct or forum-posting guidelines.
85 Human Rogue
5630
Strong CC" (Limit 1):
Knockback
Nightmarish
Vortex

"Defensive" (Limit 1):
Avenger
Extra Health
Health Link
Horde
Illusionist
Missile Dampening
Invulnerable Minions
Shielding
Vampiric

"Aggressive" (No Limit):
ArcaneEnchanted
Desecrator
Electrified
Fast
Fire Chains
Frozen
Jailer
Molten
Mortar
Plagued
Reflects Damage
Teleporter
Waller


How are jailer and Frozen not included in the strong cc..
In threads that I've responded to in the past, there were several follow-up questions and suggestions which I kept seeing over and over again. Rather than go back to those older posts and respond individually, I thought I would round them all up and provide answers here.

Since these types of posts can draw a lot of attention, please try to keep your responses as civil as possible. In the end, I'm hoping this helps provide some developer insight into a few of the recurring questions from this forum.

Questions:
1) You said you're inherently okay with players stacking certain stats over others. If this is the case, why did you nerf IAS?

One of the biggest issues we discovered with IAS was that it actively limited build diversity. While IAS was pretty strong on its own, when coupled with certain gear and skill combinations, it simply became too alluring for a lot of players to ignore. So, instead of seeing an increase in gear and skill diversity over time, what we actually saw was more and more players shifting to IAS-focused builds almost exclusively. On a scale large, it was crippling experimentation and skill diversity.

A lot of players think we reduced the value of IAS because it made characters too powerful. While that's not a totally unreasonable conclusion to jump to, it's definitely not true. We don't think "doing a lot of damage" or "doing too much damage" is enough reason for us to nerf something outright. IAS was an outlier -- it's not that it made characters too powerful, but rather that it caused a few builds to become vastly superior to others. On top of that, it introduced a ton of bugs just due to how fast characters were attacking when stacked to its upper limits.

The initial iteration of IAS was flawed in many ways. So, in effort to promote skill diversity and remove several game-impacting bugs from the environment, we reduced the value overall. We're fairly happy with where IAS is right now, as well as skill diversity in general (though we're going to need to do some additional skill balancing to bring it up to where we want).

2) So, when are you going to nerf Critical Hit Chance and Critical Hit Damage affixes?

We've no plans to nerf +Crit Chance or +Crit Damage. While +Crit Chance and +Crit Damage are very strong right now, there's nothing inherently wrong with something being strong. As mentioned above, players doing too much damage is not enough reason for us to bring out the nerf bat. Neither affix is having a negative impact on build diversity (we're seeing a pretty good balance overall), and there aren't any technical issues with them being stacked to higher values. It's something we're keeping an eye on of course.

3) Why aren't monster affix combinations restricted in some way?

Monster affixes are actually grouped into categories and then restricted based on those categories (to a degree). Our restrictions aren't as tight as some players have suggested, but in the end we found that adding extra limitations often made Elite pack encounters very predictable and repetitive, which kind of went against our design goal for these types of monsters.

We know that not all players will see eye-to-eye with us on how these categories are organized, and we expect some criticism and disagreement, especially from such a passionate group of gamers. While we're happy with where affix combos are right now, we're open to feedback and especially constructive discussion. :)

Here are the categories:

"Strong CC" (Limit 1):
  • Knockback
  • Nightmarish
  • Vortex


"Defensive" (Limit 1):
  • Avenger
  • Extra Health
  • Health Link
  • Horde
  • Illusionist
  • Missile Dampening
  • Invulnerable Minions
  • Shielding
  • Vampiric


"Aggressive" (No Limit):
  • ArcaneEnchanted
  • Desecrator
  • Electrified
  • Fast
  • Fire Chains
  • Frozen
  • Jailer
  • Molten
  • Mortar
  • Plagued
  • Reflects Damage
  • Teleporter
  • Waller


4) Is Whimsyshire considered an Act I or Act IV zone?

It's considered an Act III/Act IV zone, depending on difficulty. The monsters in Hell are considered Hell - Act IV monsters, and the monsters in Inferno are considered Inferno - Act III/Act IV monsters. The drop rates buffs from [url="http://us.battle.net/d3/en/blog/6214196/"]June 28[/url] affect the zone accordingly.

----

Suggestions:

1) Allow to gems to stack up to 100.

Totally reasonable request. We're looking into it!

(We originally set the stack size to 30 so it would fit in with the other "3" gem values. Now that it only requires 2 gems to combine into the next tier and the pattern has been broken, we've no issue increasing the base stack size. Good suggestion.)

2) Allow players to create multiple gems and items with just one click, if you have enough materials.

No plans right now to implement this kind of automated queuing for crafting.

3) Allow users to buy multiple health potions with one click.

Also a cool idea! We're looking into it.

4) Allow the Town Healer to heal your active follower too.

Ditto. We'll definitely consider this.

5) Add an option to block follower conversations.

Understandable annoyance, but no plans at this time to add in an option. Still good feedback!


LoL, what a preposterous attempt to make us think you're doing smth. Those are all minor to useless updates. What about making the game fun entirely.
Lyrra,

I would suggest:

1. to be able to click (ping) the minimap; I know this game is not WoW, but even if we played using ventrilo or any other voice communication software, map pinging would be helpful

2. bigger chat box & adjustable fonts; again, the reason I asked this is not because of WoW again, but, the current box is too small and the font is too big. I wouldnt ask for a total adjustable chat box like wow, but being able to adjust just the font size would be great (or bigger chat box lulz)

3. setting up a BUSY/AWAY messages; good to let friends know if I am in middle of things (can't answer chat) or quick afk

These are the only things I could think of at the moment, thank you
90 Worgen Death Knight
11100
Thank you, all, for continuing to bump this. I still see no reason why we should stop. :) I'll simply ignore any fanbois that chime in with their Jay Wilson smooching, and will proceed in my persistence until a Blue (or whoever) stops pretending this thread doesn't exist.

Also, nice link, Sam. I read it...and couldn't agree more. They still allow people to exchange goods/gold/money on forums, and yet do nothing about gold spammers in Trade chat in-game. Makes me sick.

** http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6079707996?page=33#660 **
90 Worgen Death Knight
11100
Bump.

** http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6079707996?page=33#660 **
You didn't just nerf IAS, you obliterated it.
Whatever your reasoning is on monster affixes, it needs to change. The games not fun as is. I want encounters to be challenging. Not, throw your corpse at this monster 100 times & pray it doesn't instant heal back to full at 3% hp.

Also, lower repair costs & add more content. Game is like 7 hours long
90 Worgen Death Knight
11100
07/16/2012 12:10 PMPosted by LunarSolaris
You didn't just nerf IAS, you obliterated it.


Pretty much, lol. The only sense of speed anymore is clicking on a Frenzied Shrine. It's like drinking an ice cold beer on the beach during 90+ degree heat. :)

** http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6079707996?page=33#660 **
Edited by EricS#1876 on 7/16/2012 12:13 PM PDT
Pretty much, lol. The only sense of speed anymore is clicking on a Frenzied Shrine. It's like drinking an ice cold beer on the beach during 90+ degree heat. :)

** http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6079707996?page=33#660 **


Please stop spamming about your post. No one cares.
90 Worgen Death Knight
11100
Pretty much, lol. The only sense of speed anymore is clicking on a Frenzied Shrine. It's like drinking an ice cold beer on the beach during 90+ degree heat. :)

** http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6079707996?page=33#660 **


Please stop spamming about your post. No one cares.


No.

** http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6079707996?page=33#660 **

Troll go under bridge and hide ugly face.
07/10/2012 06:27 PMPosted by illundreal
I love how the answer to #1 is not at all what's been said many times before. If you need a reminder: you said that it was due to resource generation caused by IAS. Not build diversity.


Ohhh snap.
trolls & spammers on forums,
should be banned
This topic is locked.

Please report any Code of Conduct violations, including:

Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.

Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.

Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.

Forums Code of Conduct

Report Post # written by

Reason
Explain (256 characters max)
Submit Cancel

Reported!

[Close]