Just for the same reasons I don't try to follow what my horoscope suggests each day.
When someone presents some *evidence* or if Blizz ever confirms any of the theories then they are worth looking at/acting upon.
Until then its /tinfoilhat mode.
So you won't assist the search for evidence, but say you will wait for people to present evidence? Do we look like ants from your high horse m'lord?
Your horse, It's dead.
Your language, suggests I'm being snobbish because I'd rather back science and common sense, than /tinfoilhat.
Sorry no. Following science is common sense. That does not include being too stubborn to change your mind when presented with *real* evidence. So yes ofc I would change my mind if there was real evidence.
I wont assist with the 'search for evidence' in this case, because there is no clear cut hypothesis and when there was on day one, it was quickly disproved but that didn't stop the conspiracy theorists.
Originally this theory claimed something like "legendaries only drop from even numbered servers". Shortly followed by various folk posting their legendaries dropped from an odd numbered servers.
This clear evidence (as often the case with /tinfoilhat) was ignored by many people and they just carried on. Only paying attention to things that confirm their theory and ignoring all that disproved it.
Some then changed the theory to "legendaries only drop from even numbered servers BUT to be a good legendary it has to be a "low" number too".
Some might have dropped the "even number" requirement at this stage and just moved onto the "low number" server theory.
Which theory are people even testing atm?