I'm not even going to continue bothering past this post, because you're missing the point.
My dice rolls have a greater chance to roll higher than yours because I have 70%+ MF over you, which is why I'm getting better drops even though you've killed (and are capable of killing) thousands more than I have. Sample size matters little, because if your rolls are consistently lower, why does it matter?
And for added bonus points (because I've already ticked you off), I just sold an Immortal King's Triumph for another $50.
I guess I'm just lucky.
You're not very smart at this game. MF does not influence the quality of the drops at all. It does not influence the rolls of the rares or legendaries. You could technically find 40 legendaries in a row and they could all be total crap. More mf does not mean quality - it just means quantity.
And while you might have 70+ mf more than me, that's not 70% better chances compared to me - it's more like 20% or so. But since I kill at least 2 elites for every one of yours (and probably a lot faster than that since I kill elites in like 5 seconds), I am actually getting almost double the drops compared to you even if I can only kill 2 elite packs for every one of yours.
But you seem to think that 20% more legendaries from your MF gives you 1000000x better chances to get a near perfect inna's vast expanse. It just won't.
You *were* lucky.
And seeing that you really don't understand the mechanics of this game, it's not surprising to me that you have no idea how lucky you were.