Get the Desktop App for Battle.net Now
- All your games in 1 place
- Log in once
- Automatic game updates
Honestly, is that 5% even going to make ANY DIFFERENCE AT ALL? Seems like a placebo to me. Seems like it will make zero difference. 30% or 35%. Really? No difference at all. Sorry no. There is no difference. You can look at this at the most logical/intellectual level, and come to one conclusion only: That 5% is literally pointless.
Edited by Banksownus#1123 on 1/30/2013 6:49 PM PST
I think OP wants melees to have 30% like the ranged.
As he said, 5% is a very small amount, but nevertheless a form of handicap given by ranged to melee.
The mighty barbarian and his bald sidekick does not need such miserable charity, neither does he want the ranged to claim that 5% is the reason they lost when he crushes them.
melee has 35% dmg reduction
Ranaged has 30% dmg reduction
This was the latest change.
The point of this thread was to illustrate that an extra 5% is useless/pointless. It will make zero difference. You might as well keep it 30% for ranged and for melee.
Edited by Banksownus#1123 on 1/30/2013 7:33 PM PST
Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.
Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.
Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.