Again, all this are too subjective to measure. For example, you might deem what you are doing on par with better specs or slightly behind. But the rest just felt that it just isn't good enough. I don't think anyone is right or wrong here. After all, is just a game and everyone's bias towards certain style.
There are not many people at all that feel like what I'm achieving isn't effective, while there's hundreds of DH's and over 90 pages of responses throughout various threads that feel like it is effective (given the player can pull it off that is). Those claims can, and have been backed up many times. You saying "the rest" shows no merit in the current other than words because you have not shown otherwise. Other than that, yes, I agree there's no right and wrong.
well yeah I did come here for the entertainment. Anyway all this range vs melee nonsense should stop. Is getting old.
:D But think for a second, the OP only made the thread to post about a personal goal. Why all the flames, or better yet, why do you support the flames when the OP was just stating a personal goal he achieved. Makes you look like you're hoping on a band wagon you don't really belong in because you're smarter than that.......
stubborn and close minded? Please dude. I've never played any mainstream specs such as EB or RF. I've hated them but I do know they are much better compared to what I ran before I sold my DH.
Much respect, but you make it sound like just because what you ran and achieve you felt was way below the standard spec, doesn't mean everyone elses experience is the same. It sounds like because you had those specific limitations that everyone else should as well, and that's simply not the case, especially a ranged spec in which player control makes or breaks a build. Being an experienced DH yourself, you should know this, in fact, I'm sure you do know this.
I'm not being what you claim I am. I'm just acknowledging they are better stuff out there.
I'm sure the entire community knows of the better stuff. It's all around the board, so I'm sure you're not doing anyone a favor by reiterating what everyone already knows, unless that's what entertains you personally :D
When I see your post, this is what I see. "Hey, Honda's have always been the most reliable cars in the history of mankind" and you can't fathom why anyone would want to by a Hyundai or a Mazda and why everyone isn't just driving a Honda, seeing how other cars according to you, aren't good enough for reliability. Ya, you claim you drove the Hyundai back in the day with their hilarious reliability issues, but things have changed, kinks have been worked out and now they are a great alternative, though still not as trustworthy as a Honda, but you refuse to accept that the Hyundai has gotten better, despite the proof in the track record, simply because to you, it's still not a Honda.
Since this is your mindset, despite us being very similar with creativity and refusing to give into the "Honda", we will never be on the same page because you've given up on the Hyundai while I chose to stand by it and work along side it to make it what it is today along with many other DH's. :D