Windwalker DPS, 2h or DW?

Monk
As title ask, what do you use for the most damage? does one pull ahead over the other?

Does one fit pve or pvp better than the other?
WW is DW while BM is 2H. MW seems to be either but I heard that DW is a little better (depends on the weapons available to you).
10/07/2012 08:22 AMPosted by Derim
WW is DW while BM is 2H. MW seems to be either but I heard that DW is a little better (depends on the weapons available to you).


Mistweaver cannot dual wield,

any other experienced monks know?
It doesn't matter.

Seriously, it doesn't. It's within like, 1%.
I've dps'd with both and i've topped damage every time with both. WW is pretty damn good dps right now. Pulling 40k with some greens and pvp gear on. Don't forget to use touch of karma and stand in the bosses hard hitting abilities ;x
Although! I was wondering if weapon speed matters or only the dps on the weapon. I have a fast staff atm and won a roll on a slower staff but gave it to a druid that didn't have a heroic weapon yet.
Highest weapon Ilvl will generally be the best choice. so like if have 450 dual wield weapons or 463 2h, just go with 2h.
10/07/2012 10:21 AMPosted by Mojitos
Highest weapon Ilvl will generally be the best choice. so like if have 450 dual wield weapons or 463 2h, just go with 2h.


This

I plan to sacrifice that 1% to keep a staff anyways. I'm sick of dual wielding, I didn't reroll from a rogue to play another rogue, constantly worrying about getting a second weapon drop. Besides staves just fit the motif better.

They balanced it around the notion that you use what you want to use.
Believe it or not, I'm starting to think Blizzard may have actually made a tanking class that can dual wield this time.

I've been trying to find information saying that I shouldn't. That there's some parry or glancing blows or some damn thing over my head that tells me not to dual wield.

I can't find it.

So why not? Grab two swords. Be a bad !@#.
According to the math DW pulls ahead of 2H by about 4% in damage. I would go DW at end game and save the 2 handers for the Brewmasters.
higher ilevel is generally the better choice because the difference isn't that much, but if it's a choice between equal items DW will always outdps 2H
10/07/2012 10:37 AMPosted by Mayliene
higher ilevel is generally the better choice because the difference isn't that much, but if it's a choice between equal items DW will always outdps 2H


Don't throw around terms like "always"

We have a tuning knob for DPS based on weapons that Blizz can easily tweak to bring two handed in line with dual wield.
It doesn't matter.

Seriously, it doesn't. It's within like, 1%.


This is wrong, at level 90 Dual wield does 4% more dps.

It is not, within 1%. It's a good amount of difference to make it worth it to get the fists instead of the staff.
Believe it or not, I'm starting to think Blizzard may have actually made a tanking class that can dual wield this time.

I've been trying to find information saying that I shouldn't. That there's some parry or glancing blows or some damn thing over my head that tells me not to dual wield.

I can't find it.

So why not? Grab two swords. Be a bad !@#.


The only reason DK's don't dual-wield tank is because they take a significant blow to DPS.

Brewmasters on the other hand can tank with either or, entirely up to the player. Each actually has pros and cons, too.
10/07/2012 08:22 AMPosted by Derim
WW is DW while BM is 2H. MW seems to be either but I heard that DW is a little better (depends on the weapons available to you).


This is not true. BM is DW. This is for 2 major reasons: Elusive Brew has a lower chance of falling off with DW giving you better EB uptimes and there are significantly more GotO procs with DW. The only advantage 2H has is better base stats. This cannot compare with higher DW.

There will be those who argue "well you get the same number of EB procs over time", but I don't need 3 stacks of EB 2 seconds AFTER my stacks fall off, I need 1-2 stacks before it falls off.
10/07/2012 08:27 AMPosted by Savedone
WW is DW while BM is 2H. MW seems to be either but I heard that DW is a little better (depends on the weapons available to you).


Mistweaver cannot dual wield,

any other experienced monks know?


The margin between 2H and DW is supposed to be marginal. And, for the most part it is. You won't notice an inherent difference until you are endgame with significant gear, at which point DW takes the lead by a small margin.

Currently, DW is better for Brewmasters than 2H.

All that being said, if you are DW blue weapons from heroics or crafted, and have an opportunity to get an epic 2H, the epic 2H will be better until you can get the epic fist weapons.
It doesn't matter.

Seriously, it doesn't. It's within like, 1%.


This is wrong, at level 90 Dual wield does 4% more dps.

It is not, within 1%. It's a good amount of difference to make it worth it to get the fists instead of the staff.

4% is less than the difference from using a higher ilvl weapon. So the real takeaway is to use the highest ilvl weapon you can find, and then focus on getting DW if possible.

That 502 staff drops, you take it.


This is wrong, at level 90 Dual wield does 4% more dps.

It is not, within 1%. It's a good amount of difference to make it worth it to get the fists instead of the staff.

4% is less than the difference from using a higher ilvl weapon. So the real takeaway is to use the highest ilvl weapon you can find, and then focus on getting DW if possible.

That 502 staff drops, you take it.


This is true of anything, he's asking which is better.

Three items of equal ilvl the DW will be better.
I find that Tiger Strike is up more when dual wielding.
I hear that Onyxia uses Deep Breath more this patch

Join the Conversation

Return to Forum