Question...

Warrior
.
Lol.
Step one. OP rolls new class hoping it's DK's v2.0
Step two. OP realizes blizzard isn't going to make the same mistake twice.
Step three.OP cries about another class being strong.
Briyan you read my mind :o
Playing a wimpy toon all through wrath and cata has humbled me beyond words... ...dying as a speed bump against every other class has fortified my character and understanding of loss and pain. Armed thus, I now ride the crest of the wave as opposed to the trough. Also I make bloody chunks outta monks;)
Step one. OP rolls new class hoping it's DK's v2.0
Step two. OP realizes blizzard isn't going to make the same mistake twice.
Step three.OP cries about another class being strong.


Wow, you could not be more inaccurate. Thanks for trying.

Seriously though, I decided to roll the class because it looked super fun -- however I didn't expect it to be this terrible at PvP. Going by your logic, I would have ragequit this toon a long time ago when I realized they weren't, as you said, "DK 2.0". However, I have fully acknowledged that currently WW monks are not in a very good place at all in PvP, yet I stay with the class because I enjoy it. Personally, I do think that warriors are very OP right now, and I'm perfectly within my rights to voice my opinions about them -- even if it is jumping into the lion's den of the Warrior forums.
monks crying about others being OP as 5.2 is about to drop.

oh the irony
Happy is not so Happy.

Happy mad
I have not played the PTR but yes, I've heard that the monks are doing better in 5.2 However, their survival is still atrocious.

Warriors on the other hand don't need anymore damage, imo, coupled with their survivability -- which in my experience appears to be pretty high. Grats on your un-nerfed Second Wind, too.

And yes, Happy a bit frustrated.
Apparently we've been FOTM since the game launched. I think its time to change that moniker. We're flavor of the forever, baby.
Dumb.
It's me. I'm the crutch holding the lesser classes down so Warriors can have the prominent place they are entitled to.
02/20/2013 08:17 AMPosted by Secondwind
It's me. I'm the crutch holding the lesser classes down so Warriors can have the prominent place they are entitled to.


We love you for your mind-numbing capacity for math and equations.
OP your name is misleading. My warrior brain hurts now. Thanks a lot.
02/20/2013 08:24 AMPosted by Liore
It's me. I'm the crutch holding the lesser classes down so Warriors can have the prominent place they are entitled to.


We love you for your mind-numbing capacity for math and equations.


I was referring to my name rather than my posting, but thanks!
02/20/2013 08:28 AMPosted by Edith
OP your name is misleading. My warrior brain hurts now. Thanks a lot.


Mistake not, I am usually quite happy -- warriors just make me sad.
I don't have a high rating so no. I will play my warrior and enjoy it regardless of viability (played and enjoyed Cata).

Warriors are strong but most of the top WoW PvPers agree that ferals, spriests, and mages are all better than warriors and that hunters are equal with them. That puts them at 4-5th place out of 11 classes. Warriors are just the only one of those classes that sits in your face the whole match and therefore annoys you the most.
poor wittle monkie comin to worrior forums qqing cuz he suks n cant be big ol worrior aweeeeeee
Ill still beat you in 5.2 happy.
02/20/2013 02:08 PMPosted by Rezneck
poor wittle monkie comin to worrior forums qqing cuz he suks n cant be big ol worrior aweeeeeee


Thank you for more than proving my point.

/thread

Join the Conversation

Return to Forum