People are again just clumping up all their problems with the matchmaker against the same umbrella.
That's not how it works. I can attest that the matchmaker is working fine for me in both QM and HL, for example.
Really, are you checking HotSlogs to confirm?
I've seen plenty of matches on my accounts (both of them, widely different MMR) where the average of each team is close, but one team has a very high + very low MMR player, while the other team has all average MMR players. Generally the result is a loss for the team with an extremely low MMR player. These type of matches are much more common than matches where the average MMR differs by more than 300 between two teams.
Lately on my first account I've seen a lot of HL matches where the average is 100MMR below my own. At the low end of the spectrum (where my first account is stuck), that is painful beyond belief. The number of games with 700MMR players, 900MMR players, etc is just ludicrous.
In fact, I just went and looked at some recent matches on my primary account, and some of them my team was 200MMR below me on average, one of them was almost 400 less. That game had two, yes
two sub-1K MMR players on my team, the other three of us were 1900-2200. The enemy team was almost 1950 on average. Any guesses on the outcome of that game? Here's a hint: The 900MMR Azmodan didn't come to a single team fight all game long.
10/14/2015 05:27 PMPosted by
Sole Consider reducing the maximum MMR spread per team to 300. Would help a lot. Thanks.
It should be a percentage, not a fixed amount. A difference of 300MMR is massive if you're playing at 1500.