Battle.net

@Field: Posting user names who cheat would be a MAJOR breach of privacy.

@Juice: I remember Nexon did that. Why don't they just put it in the agreement thingy that nobody reads?

@KingArthas: As is true with any level of punishment, there will always be innocents that get punished and offenders that get away. As you change the level of strictness you change the ratio of innocents getting punished to offenders getting off free.

I suspect that Blizzard is more likely to let more offenders free than to punish innocents. The level of bad feelings from customers is reduced that way.

@HelpMe:

What's pay2use or external hacks. I'm not familiar

@Kynth: I don't think its the same people responsible for the PSN hack. That stuff was serious like info leakage like addresses and emails and all. But this is just like cheating, like maphacks on multiplayer, still important to stop though. But they also had external reasons for the PSN job they wanted revenge on how Sony jailed one of their members or something. Great job blizzard.

@Kynth: The Playstation Network/Qrocity explotion was most likely Anonymous. Which if you didn't know, are a group of internet vigilantes. Sometimes they do really good things but most of the time they just attempt to screw things up. The reason they exploited these Sony related services is because Sony filed a lawsuit against the original PS3 hacker, George Hotz. Anonymous has obviously denied this because of the size and severity of this hack, but it is most likely them.

@Burritoman: Anon only attacked sony's website. Sony in turn shut down their network to prevent further damage and blamed it on anon. Someone else got the info. Anon doesn't harm the innocent.

@Bender: get caught cheating did ya? haha

@Bender: yeah if you were caught cheating, you deserve it :(

@AzTroRisK: You can't be serious.

@kornbeaner: Unless you have some type of proof, I wouldn't report it. Sometimes will blast out a bunch of games and jump ahead. He may have a big pool. It does suck, when someone pushes you down but that doesn't mean they're cheating.

@Canehdn: its not getting pushed out that is bugging me, that's the way the game goes I get that. But this guys wasn't even top 8 yesterday all of sudden he's way above all of the top 8 players. I'm more suspicious of his match history, I went through a bunch of his games going back a month and none of his games lasted more then 10 minutes. I know quick matches can take place, but to have a majority of your match go less than 10 minutes, while blasting ahead of everybody, almost seems like he found a way to boost (cheat boosting) his way to top. Either way I don't care, it doesn't reflect on my skills as a player, I just want the boards to be legit, I hate seeing hackers and cheaters on leaderboards. No proof just very suspicious.

@kornbeaner: Not suspicious at all actually. He is most likely just rushing/all-ins in his games and wins by either catching his opponent off guard or loses because he can't transition out of it. 10 minutes would fit that time frame just fine.

@kornbeaner: He was smurfing for wins. I did the same thing. he is actually a diamond/masters player.

@kornbeaner: He's prob just a Port farmer man or just has an alt account, talk to people in his match history and see if they can watch the replays for you.

PS: study your replays after you matches there are still alot of hackers out there man.

@kornbeaner: when i got demoted from gold to silver i was placed in the #1 spot. He might have been gold till recently.

@RaveTemplar: I didn't think of that actually, that would explain why he has 100+ wins. That makes sense, glad I didn't report him. But going by his match history he is one cheesy player. O'well to each their own.