Battle.net

@TeaTime: Pretty much exactly what I was thinking

@TeaTime: I can't imagine production as Terran or Protoss because of this.

@Jim: Agreed. I loved putting my first hatchery at the choke point and backed with lurkers. Their range and damage is impressive; even if a few are out they can turn the tide. They can also be used for back of base tactics. I was thinking the same thing when i first started multiplayer, "where the hell are the lurkers?"

@Jim: Agreed. I loved putting my first hatchery at the choke point and backed with lurkers. Their range and damage is impressive; even if a few are out they can turn the tide. They can also be used for back of base tactics. I was thinking the same thing when i first started multiplayer, "where the hell are the lurkers?"

@Andtron: I think that would be an awsome idea so we can see the better guides from the spam

@Andtron: yes that is a great idea

ya blizzard you should probably do that @Andtron:

@Smedley: Yes it is true I go and look back at alot of games to especially if I got slapped hard in the face. But I would reccomend to do your research online with diamond players tactics for all races as well, they are the best for a reason. But I warn you not to just look for the build tree and think it's a cure all like most people do but to understand why they are doing it. Understand sometimes you will have to totally ditch what you are doing on your initial plan and go another direction. I have learned alot from both the review and the diamond tactics. I will also say I don't agree with all diamond tactics either but I understand them and why they work well and where they are weak. One more suggestion I offer too is to look at all the players when you review and try understand why they doing what they are doing to counter you or anybody else and what weak spot they are going for. Then look at the build tree and see the tendencies i.e. what they have to build and how long. If you can catch on to that you will be light years ahead because you can anticipate what they doing by there tendency even if you get just a glimpse. It will also teach you when and where you need to ditch a tech tree and start another early on in the game. Bottom line if you ever get in a game where you don't have a solution immediately to what your opponent is doing go back and don't stop reviewing until you have a solution and a strong counter to it.

@YogiBear: I agree that having some notion of what your opponent is building, is going to be the biggest factor in determining what you want to build to use against that.

@YogiBear: I can't agree with more with what you are saying I don't how many times as a toss player I have sat and watched people build away with a probe in there base. Half the time I freak out my terran teammate because he wants me to put max units out asap. Yet I don't because I'm waiting to see what I need plus it makes me look wide open when I'm not. Sure I have some but the unit looks small. I have won majority of my games because of the counter and hitting the soft spots or by pinching an attacking army and working the micro with a smaller army that counters them. When I personally worry is when I don't know what the other player is doing or when I have to play a game attrition by holding the map. You can gain alot but loose it quickly too because of insane multitasking.