Interceptor threat

Posts: 388
What's the logic by having interceptors = threat as the carriers that launch them/the voids attacking? No pathing issue like there is with broodlings. Can't think of a situation ever where it'd be beneficial to attack them over other units.
Reply Quote
Posts: 7,799
It was beneficial in BW because barriers were microed over ledges and high ground against goliaths, the goliaths couldn't always reach the carriers. This created some very interesting micro.

Now its just vikings vs carriers. Thats why it seems pointless.
Reply Quote
Posts: 482
That's the point... you can right click on the carriers you know
Reply Quote
Posts: 8,201
Some units can be better off attacking the interceptors first (marines, for example, especially if there is intervening terrain or forcefields below the carriers themselves.)
Reply Quote
Posts: 4,319
It really depends on what kind of army the carriers are fighting. If you're fighting stalkers, hydras, vikings, corruptors, etc. (and your opponent is too dumb to right click the carriers) it is a blessing. If you're fighting marines it is a curse.
Given that carriers are actually semi-viable against zerg and protoss (could use some minor buffs) and garbage against terran because of marines, I think dropping the threat or at least making it lower than the carrier could work.
Reply Quote

Please report any Code of Conduct violations, including:

Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.

Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.

Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.

Forums Code of Conduct

Report Post # written by

Reason
Explain (256 characters max)

Reported!

[Close]