That is the point. The story would still be great, and almost everyone would like the story even if the graphics werent so great. They like it for the story.
Although Sc1's graphics were horrible (good at that time) the game compensated for that in many many many ways .
Hots's story was horrible but it felt much much better because of the design part of the game .
What does this have to do with what you said ?
And btw ... you keep talking about ,,off screen'' when has this happened ? Then we aren't talking about a game anymore ... Wanna compare sc1 and hots bringing them to the same design level , do so , but don't start wildly changing the whole concept
Yes we are talking about the story, but they do not believe that final scene was a good part of the story. People find both raynor and tychus's actions stupid, and the kerrigan's reaction as well. They would feel this way regardless of how high definition, realistic, exciting, low quality, or even if this happened off screen. They hate it because of the story, the same reason other people would like it for the story.
While giving this example , please explain why those actions are stupid , ok ''?
If not for the game part of the ...erm ... game , 99% of those people wouldn't even be there.
I don't understand why you are trying to give these ,,writing on a screen'' examples which deny Starcraft it's very nature ... but regardless
I was asking where your view was, but as you can see, the graphics have nothing to do with why people like or do not like the story. Many people hate both WoL and HotS because of the relationship.
However, your reason for liking it, has little to do with graphics.
After speaking with me for a week or more you still have 0 clue about what my pov is ... and you keep saying graphics , graphics ,graphics , graphics ....
I'm starting to think if this has any point ...