12/04/2010 8:49 AMPosted by Primuz
I never said they weren't balanced around CS. The post you quoted was simply me stating how useless it is to compare melee magical damage attacks to a warrior attacking a target with 100% armor pen. The two things are not remotely comparable or the same.
Well feel free to clarify exactly what you meant. By saying that two methods of bypassing armor are not the same you're implying that one is balanced around that fact and the other is not. I'm pointing out that the game at 85 was balanced around CS so in fact all the armor piercing abilities of each class were accounted for at 85.
And this is where your post went to the sewers. Warriors are more susceptible to CC then other melee? Rofl Ret would like to have a word with you. I mean you are more susceptible to CC other then fear breaks and immunity on short cooldowns, and the ability to rage out of sap...
Lol yeah you have been the most dominate and powerful melee class in arena for all but one season because you are so weak and fragile.
The point I was trying to make is that pointing out the theoretical damage capabilities of one single move and claiming it is the end all definition of 85 is narrow minded. Considering there's lots of factors to take into account when you look at the viability of each class at 85. If doing tons of upfront is the only thing that defines a win then everybody would just wear straight PVE gear.