Get the Desktop App for Battle.net Now
- All your games in 1 place
- Log in once
- Automatic game updates
01/11/2011 10:53 AMPosted by RoflologistWhat you are doing is confusing two seperate issues. The first issue is Blizzard wants LEGITIMATE interest in the ownership of Tol Barad. This is accomplished by giving rewards to the Defender. If there is no incentive there is no competition. This is common sense.
The second issue, and the one you are having problems with, is that Tol Barad is unfair to the Attackers.
This is unfortunate for you, because if Blizzard wants LEGITIMATE interest in the ownership in Tol Barad, it can only come by giving both of those to the Defender. It must be hard to attack, and there must be great bonuses for winning on Defense.
01/11/2011 11:04 AMPosted by RoflologistThe attacking side will almost always be the underpowered faction on a server, they will be underpowered with the odds of the battleground stacked against them. They deserve to receive a better reward if they're able to somehow win control of the zone.
Then they can simply limit the number of attackers that can join. This has nothing to do with the Honor reward for defending.
This is how you are confusing the two issues, therefore your problem needs to be with the queuing algorithm, not the incentives.
I cannot be more clear than that.
01/11/2011 10:58 AMPosted by AragsonThere is no pleasing us people? Are you happy with the garbage PvP they call Tol Barad?! It's like winning AB by defending Farm only... GTFO
Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.
Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.
Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.