4.3 Battleground Conquest Rewards

85 Night Elf Druid
4445



English, do you speak it?

Please leave.


as noted by expanding the connotations of the words you're using...
note: you said a group of people will be unhappy with this change. then you said people who enjoy seeing other people happy will enjoy this change.
english, do you read it?
would ask to leave, but...(reiterate last sentence)



Um. I didn't say that. How retarded are you?
The demerit of this change is: when you hit 1650 conquest cap (for bg, it is 1250), you will not be interested in doing more bg.
7 Human Warlock
0



as noted by expanding the connotations of the words you're using...
note: you said a group of people will be unhappy with this change. then you said people who enjoy seeing other people happy will enjoy this change.
english, do you read it?
would ask to leave, but...(reiterate last sentence)



Um. I didn't say that. How retarded are you?


not retarded enough to see your point..."People who are not happy about this change are:

1.) Struggling losing lots of arena matches every week with a low cap and are frustrated and want to take that out on someone else.
2. etc..."
also "People who are happy about this change are:
1.)...
...
4.) People who are happy in real life and enjoy seeing others find happiness in their activities."
last post replied to original
Edit- again: group 1 under "not happy", group 4 under "happy", going to reiterate "english, do you read it?"
Edited by Yrthrdwrflok on 11/18/2011 1:45 PM PST
74 Tauren Paladin
670
11/17/2011 09:06 AMPosted by Urge
So everyone will be in PVP gear.


As if they already aren't?
85 Goblin Shaman
1785
11/18/2011 01:40 PMPosted by Phalasar
So everyone will be in PVP gear.


As if they already aren't?


^wat you mean, no1 hav pvp gear..
90 Night Elf Druid
10395
as noted by expanding the connotations of the words you're using...note: you said a group of people will be unhappy with this change. then you said people who enjoy seeing other people happy will enjoy this change. english, do you read it?would ask to leave, but...(reiterate last sentence)Um. I didn't say that. How retarded are you?not retarded enough to see your point..."People who are not happy about this change are:1.) Struggling losing lots of arena matches every week with a low cap and are frustrated and want to take that out on someone else. 2. etc..."also "People who are happy about this change are:1.)......4.) People who are happy in real life and enjoy seeing others find happiness in their activities."last post replied to originalEdit- again: group 1 under "not happy", group 4 under "happy", going to reiterate "english, do you read it?"


Part of me wanted to ask what this even means and the other part said if I asked, that shortly after 5 more nonsense posts would follow. Unfortunately for my conservative side, my curious side won.
85 Night Elf Druid
4445



Um. I didn't say that. How retarded are you?


not retarded enough to see your point..."People who are not happy about this change are:

1.) Struggling losing lots of arena matches every week with a low cap and are frustrated and want to take that out on someone else.
2. etc..."
also "People who are happy about this change are:
1.)...
...
4.) People who are happy in real life and enjoy seeing others find happiness in their activities."
last post replied to original
Edit- again: group 1 under "not happy", group 4 under "happy", going to reiterate "english, do you read it?"


0/10 troll effort.

85 Worgen Druid
3120


Because as it is now you have to work hard for points cap in 2s? Don't make me laugh. This change is simply leveling the playing field for non-rated pvp. What's wrong with that?

Would you rather they "fix" your gear to honor gear stat budgets when you enter a random bg? That's how they're handling the new 5 man dungeons.

Or do you think you actually deserve an advantage over others for facerolling through 8 arena wins every week (which are faster and easier than winning random bgs)?

edit:



Since when is doing 8 games and one rbg for full cap hard? If you're running non-2200 gear, then the gear really isn't earned. You put in a small amount of effort to get some gear.

Like Evinrude said, this is a great change for many reasons, for the people that are complaining about this, y'alls glass must be half full. Really get over it.


I completely agree. You don't even have to bother with doing any rbgs, since you can convert 250 VP from 5 mans to CP.


The ISSUE: BG'S HAVE ALWAYS BEEN BOTTABLE.... sorry to say, its a fact. The change is now providing access to gear "PVPers" work to get. Yet a simple bot can now grind out endless AV's akf's or running into walls to get. Its simply a bad idea.

Once more, I position the same situation to you PVEers, what feathers would be torched if bots could endlessly grind out valor or your "precious" purple gear?
90 Night Elf Warrior
11865
not retarded enough to see your point..."People who are not happy about this change are:

1.) Struggling losing lots of arena matches every week with a low cap and are frustrated and want to take that out on someone else.
2. etc..."
also "People who are happy about this change are:
1.)...
...
4.) People who are happy in real life and enjoy seeing others find happiness in their activities."
last post replied to original
Edit- again: group 1 under "not happy", group 4 under "happy", going to reiterate "english, do you read it?"



Dude, don't drink the !@#$ water. Also, your nonsensical pseudo-lyrical writing is making my eyes bleed. If you're going to try and make a valid point please do so in manner that is cohesive and within the paradigms set by the English language.


I honestly am not opposed to this change-- it makes running pug bgs more appealing. I can still do arena, still do rbgs, and now have another means of point capping for the week. I fail to see the downside in this. As far as the whole "there is no longer any point in arena" is concerned, people are still going to do arena regardless. Remember, there are a number of people out there who do arena and PvP purely for fun.
26 Night Elf Rogue
220
11/18/2011 12:07 PMPosted by Shadeshifter
So... your basically just building PVP into a side thing that anyone can jump into and those of us who mainly PVP with little to no PVE aren't rewarded by that at all... thanks =/

Uhhh, you're rewarded with:
1) Higher conquest point caps
2) Higher iLevel 2.2k PvP gear

This way people don't have to do nonsense like "2's for points" (as much) any more and gives us more options. Why are you complaining? Hell, doing "2's for points" would still be a faster way to earn conquest points.
Edited by Aluciel on 11/18/2011 2:27 PM PST
85 Troll Warlock
2185
Awesome! I'm a casual player and don't really have the time to look for rated bg team or the time to cordinate being on at exactlly the same time as arena partner every time. Was considering doing dungeons and trading valor for conquest to get the gear i want but i don't really care for doing dungeons. So this takes care of everything :-)
85 Tauren Shaman
9285
I find funny how people complain about bots in bgs as if they exist only in your team, never in your enemy team.
Also I dont think they are so common as people claim for two reasons:
1) i dont see them much myself
2) i cant find a great benefit on using a bot (let me elaborate more on this last one):
If someone like pvp it is more likely they will play by themselves.
If they dont like to pvp why would they care having a bot farming pvp gear? For looks? Or because they only like to play once they have a full set? Hum, maybe. Lets take a deeper look onto that one.
If someone uses a bot their change to win is lower than if they have actually played, so it would only speed it up if they dont have time to play the game. And why would they want to play only with a full set? Because it gives me some advantage over other people? Well yes if other people dont have a full set too. But if they playing for real instead of using a bot chances are they will have it before boters, not after (unless they dont play much).
Ok so they decided to use a bot to farm gear so they can have a full set before other people. Great but how long will this advantage last? how long will take for someone to have a full set without using a bot?
The real "advantage" of using a bot would be the time between they get a full set and the time they would take to get a full set without cheating. How much time we talking about? A week?
so lets put the reasons someone would bot
1) they like pvp only when outgearing people
2) they only play while the above is true
As you can see we wont see their bots for long and neither the actual player for long either, if they are any logical even being cheaters.
85 Gnome Mage
3220
People will not be able to get gear faster, there will still be the 1650 cap unless you arena, so its essentially the same as ppl makes ghetto groups to get their week cap.
86 Human Mage
2695
How much do you guys suck if you cant win under 10 games a week on a 2's team with a random? It takes like an hour....this is a ridiculous claim.

I'm not a hardcore pvpr but there are some people complaining that they dont have the time to cap in 2's and that this is a glorious change for the casuals....but they have time to cap in BGs? HOW DOES THIS MAKE SENSE???!?? BGs take WAY longer than 2's.

I don't understand why everyone is so stoked on this. This is a way less efficient way of gaining conquest. Why can't you guys just run 2's sub 1000, it's easy.
Edited by Thaddox on 11/18/2011 3:25 PM PST
85 Tauren Shaman
9285
Yeah Thaddox is right imo
85 Human Rogue
RX
4905
11/17/2011 09:06 AMPosted by Urge
So everyone will be in PVP gear.


Cause 2's is so hard.
This topic has reached its post limit. You may no longer post or reply to posts for this topic.

Please report any Code of Conduct violations, including:

Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.

Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.

Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.

Forums Code of Conduct

Report Post # written by

Reason
Explain (256 characters max)
Submit Cancel

Reported!

[Close]