Topic Dual Weilding DK Tanks... Why abolish them?
ßoßarc
Uldaman
ßoßarc
85 Orc Death Knight
1520
Edited by ßoßarc on 2/17/12 4:49 PM (PST)
Why did you have to take that away? Why not place Threat of Thessarian on the bottom tier of Frost so Blood DKs could have their right to weapons with tanking stats? If we could have the option of getting Threat of Thessarian and Nerves of Cold Steel, we could choose which we'd like to do (DW or 2H), and to have that choice would not only add a slight diversity to the boring, cookie-cutter ways of DKs right now, but also make a lot of DKs happy, including myself.

Please, someone with power notice this. :)

EDIT: I'm done on this post. Cry at will, I'm gone. <3
Hooves
Burning Legion
Hooves
85 Tauren Warrior
6010
no
ßoßarc
Uldaman
ßoßarc
85 Orc Death Knight
1520
02/17/2012 03:19 PMPosted by Zorosblade
Please for the sake of everything everywhere stop beating a dead horse.


Why? If they still haven't noticed it by now it should still be mentioned.

02/17/2012 03:20 PMPosted by Hooves
no

Explain yourself?
Ghoulsmasher
Moon Guard
Ghoulsmasher
85 Orc Death Knight
4200
2-Handers work just fine.

Don't fix what ain't broke.
Zapwidget
Darrowmere
Zapwidget
10 Gnome Mage
240
Blizzard isn't outright saying you can't DW tank. They just aren't going out of their way to support it. There's no reason to. The only thing DW tanking accompishes is making shield tanks have to compete with DK tanks for weapons, and let's face it, you're only there so we don't have to compete as much and we couldn't find a druid.

OK, that was a little harsh, but really, there's no reason to actively support DW tanking. And besides, they damn well better give Enhancement back supported 2H before they give DKs supported DW tanking.
Judgesyou
Korgath
Judgesyou
85 Human Paladin
4225
Dual Weilding DK Tanks... Why even have them?
ßoßarc
Uldaman
ßoßarc
85 Orc Death Knight
1520
Edited by ßoßarc on 2/17/12 4:32 PM (PST)
Look, (this is more towards the first few commenters, the ones who blatantly just said "no" and attempted to dismiss me) I don't give a rats !@# how many people have beaten this dead horse, I deserve my chance to voice my opinion, WITHOUT people being so rude to me.

Okay.


02/17/2012 03:30 PMPosted by Geliebter
2-Handers work just fine.


Two-handers work, yes. But overall the stats from dual wielding would be better for us imo.



02/17/2012 03:30 PMPosted by Zapwidget
OK, that was a little harsh, but really, there's no reason to actively support DW tanking. And besides, they damn well better give Enhancement back supported 2H before they give DKs supported DW tanking.


There is a reason, imo. The benefits from more tanking stats. No, it's not needed, but it would be nice. And I agree, 2h Enhance should be supported.



02/17/2012 03:41 PMPosted by Judgesyou
Dual Weilding DK Tanks... Why even have them?


Answered in this comment already.
Euliat
Gilneas
Euliat
85 Draenei Death Knight
8665
02/17/2012 04:04 PMPosted by ßoßarc
Two-handers work, yes. But overall the stats from dual wielding would be better for us imo.


Not significantly so.
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/3881712442#11

Also a DPS loss.
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/968396860?page=37#739

Capable, sure, but not supported. Your damaging abilities are based off of weapon damage. 1H's just simply hit for less and the increase in auto-attacks don't make up for it.
Ghoulsmasher
Moon Guard
Ghoulsmasher
85 Orc Death Knight
4200
The benefit from tanking weapons would barely be noticeable.

2-Handers have more Mastery and Stamina, and we can reforge the other stat to something we can use.

There's no good reason for us to be fighting shield tanks for weapons.
Alandrek
Whisperwind
Alandrek
85 Human Paladin
10580
02/17/2012 04:04 PMPosted by ßoßarc
I don't give a rats !@# how many people have beaten this dead horse, I deserve my chance to voice my opinion


And we have just as much right to point out that your opinion on this long-ago decided issue is neither new nor interesting, and you're about as likely to have a meteor fall on your head as change Blizzard's mind on the subject.

Blizzard has decided for the sake of streamlining class balance that they will only support 2H tanking for DKs. That said, there's nothing preventing you from tanking with two weapons - there just won't be a significant amount of support in things like talents.

Worst-case, you'll have lower threat and DPS than if you used a 2H.
ßoßarc
Uldaman
ßoßarc
85 Orc Death Knight
1520
02/17/2012 04:09 PMPosted by Geliebter
There's no good reason for us to be fighting shield tanks for weapons.

I have both a Paladin tank and a Warrior tank. I have gotten both of their shields and 1h's with extreme ease, and I have been passing on shields and 1h's for weeks, if not months now. I don't see the issue.
Ghoulsmasher
Moon Guard
Ghoulsmasher
85 Orc Death Knight
4200
02/17/2012 04:17 PMPosted by ßoßarc
There's no good reason for us to be fighting shield tanks for weapons.

I have both a Paladin tank and a Warrior tank. I have gotten both of their shields and 1h's with extreme ease, and I have been passing on shields and 1h's for weeks, if not months now. I don't see the issue.


Then RNG was your friend.

Some tanks don't see a weapon upgrade for a month. Imagine how angry they'd be if a DK rolled on it when it finally dropped for his Blood OS.
ßoßarc
Uldaman
ßoßarc
85 Orc Death Knight
1520
02/17/2012 04:21 PMPosted by Geliebter
Imagine how angry they'd be if a DK rolled on it when it finally dropped for his Blood OS.


That is a MS / OS issue, not a wielding issue.

Please report any Code of Conduct violations, including:

Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.

Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.

Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.

Click here to view the Forums Code of Conduct.

Report Post # written by
Reason
Explain (256 characters max)

Reported!

[Close]