Topic
LEVEL 90 ? really this is a joke ?
|
Edited by Katiepeary on 9/29/12 5:10 PM (PDT)
enough said. lol standing still for six sex to evo every 40 sex, decrease mobility ? lol be a clothie and let a ret paladin eat you alive. even iw. 14k damage shield ? i mean not to say anything stupid but compare to avatar and everyone elses i feel like 14k is what ? lets u survive one tick from a dot ? spriests and can fear u twice in a row dispell a 60k ice barrier take off iw and 3 shot a mage, they can also heal themselves to full instantly. lol and rop is the dumbest thing ive ever seen, what am i going to do in this tiny circle and im going to get smashed in with the stupid cast time for a small circle my poo poo wont even fit in. it must be APRIL in Blizzards calendar because they must be joking if they think subs will stick to diehard mages. im weaker with more baggage at 90 then i was at 89 bcuz of all the crap u hafta do in order to use your talents.
btw when i tried RoP i laughed and said really a cast time ? and after i was done casting i said "hmm i cant really do anything in this tiny circle, maybe i should just /sleep because its useless, and it replaces evo ? evo replenishes 60% health. LOL so u telling a mage to stand still in this little tiny circle for 60 SEX to get the equivalent of a evocate i can do in 6 sex ? plus invocation doesnt heal u till after its completed. ONLY REALLY STUPID players will not cs you or interupt you while your doing, and again IW is such a weak itty bitty spell, make it last 60 sex shield at least problem solved, 8 sex ? thats stupid. at least mana shield was better and blizz has to scale our shield according to how much damage is scaled at level 90, cant use a 85 level based skill when damage out put on a mage at 90 is quadrupled. |
|
Keep it real blizzard, because you know the players will, and realistically the classes who got something good for end game will keep subs. not the ones that are useless.
|
|
i am but its still retardedly weak as !@#$, 14k damage bubble ? mana shield was better at lvl 85, wont do nothing when ur a clothie and %^-*ed are hitting u for 70k, its less damage absorbtion then a lock dot.
|
|
It appears that you wasted a LOT of time leveling a mage to 90. I suggest you play a shadowpriest or ele shaman
|
|
I don't think you understand the point of Incanter's Ward. It's for the mana regen and spell damage bonus, not the little absorb. Also, you can spell steal spriests. You have to use all of your tools.
|
|
Is that english you're typing? I cannot tell.
|
|
In fact, the strength of the absorb was reduced during beta due to complaints that sometimes it wouldn't get popped easily enough, and you wouldn't get the full damage bonus. ________________________________________________ Find answers to questions about Mage mechanics in Lhivera’s Compendium • http://lhiveras-library.com/compendium |
|
so these problems have been going on since beta and noones fixed them ?
|
|
yeah mages are weak, when u take the fun out of the game theres no point of playing, i see alot of people saying it in a creative form on how to fix, but this just sucks so ill say it how i see it and know how to say it
|
real smart why would u nerf that ? thats the stupidest thing ive heard, if blizz wanted to give a damage buff make it a 25% passive buff and leave it at that, but dont make level 90 harder 2 play keep it simple |
|
Edited by Jondy on 9/29/12 7:13 PM (PDT)
Blizzard is trying to move away from as many passive things as possiable u know the days when a melees 80% of there dps was from auto attacks aka they wantz u to hit da buttons to do deeps kinda thing:) and think about it slightly just slightly and be glad we are not OP means we get buffed not nerfed in the next patch:) |
no i wanna qq more |
|
|
whatever i dont consider myself a troll but this is real |
|
its funny when u got a million people saying the same thing, and the mvp guy probably aint pissed off cz his mage is barely lvl 87. quit backing up stupid talents
|
|
i hope blizzard really looks at the forums
|
