Clarification on nerf to Spinning Crane Kick

90 Pandaren Monk
9575
Could we get some clarification on the reasoning behind this please? Top logs show that while throughput was good, it wasn’t game-breaking due to its highly situational use. 30% nerf to healing done seems excessive this early in the content cycle.
Reply Quote
90 Undead Monk
3630
Where's the patch notes?
Reply Quote
90 Troll Monk
0
Your kung fu like your mind is weak
Reply Quote
90 Pandaren Monk
9575
10/09/2012 08:15 PMPosted by Chooby
Where's the patch notes?


It's in today's hotfixes.
Reply Quote
90 Pandaren Monk
0
Reads on forums: lot's of QQ about how bad Monks are in general

Blizzard's world: Ignore said forums and nerf monks hotfix after hotfix
Reply Quote
90 Troll Monk
0
Jab faster
kick harder

Grasshopper

you shall overcome all
Reply Quote
90 Pandaren Monk
9575
Jab faster
kick harder

Grasshopper

you shall overcome all


I like this guy
Reply Quote
100 Blood Elf Monk
13045
SCK->CB (and SCK->ZSD even moreso when its diminishing wasn't working) was ridiculously, obnoxiously, unquestionably overpowered in situations where you were healing a raid stacked in one place taking even damage. As an example, if you were even halfway competent at using it on Feng you would destroy all other healing classes by a completely absurd margin.

The problem is that they balanced SCK's healing around a 3s channel that didn't scale with haste, then late in the beta (after raid testing was done) in order to buff WW AE they cut it down to a 2.25s channel that scaled with haste. A 30% healing nerf offsets that buff a lot but not entirely, since you're still generating chi faster than you were at a 3s cast and thus throwing out more CBs. Because of that monks are still going to top meters in those situations, you're just going to do 120-130% of the next class' healing instead of 150-180%.
Reply Quote
90 Troll Monk
0
Your words are wise

spinning crane kick was embarrassing fellow comrade healers forcing them to Seppuku in shame.
Reply Quote
90 Pandaren Monk
10080
SCK was a fairly minor and incorrect nerf to healing. All it does is hurt our sustained AOE, which isn't where this bloat in HPS comes from. Although great, it doesn't compare to TFT or Zen Sphere(Pre-nerf) in healing, so they are targeting the wrong spells to get a hold on "overpowered" monk healing.

Good job, great checking them logs blizzard.
Reply Quote
100 Blood Elf Monk
13045
SCK was a fairly minor and incorrect nerf to healing. All it does is hurt our sustained AOE, which isn't where this bloat in HPS comes from. Although great, it doesn't compare to TFT or Zen Sphere(Pre-nerf) in healing, so they are targeting the wrong spells to get a hold on "overpowered" monk healing.

Good job, great checking them logs blizzard.
There are other situations where monk healing is probably too high, but you're either not looking at logs correctly or straight-up delusional if you don't think a hit to SCK->CB was warranted. It was the most blatantly obvious place where monks were too good due to the reasons I stated above, so obviously it was the first place to hit.
Edited by Suzushiirou on 10/10/2012 5:32 AM PDT
Reply Quote
90 Pandaren Monk
6075
the nerf was because even I was doing 3k heals per tick to everyone that was around at level 60. in case you haven't noticed level 60s generally only have between 5-7k health. thats two ticks pretty much full health.
Reply Quote
90 Pandaren Monk
8195
Every healer does ridiculous healing in the low levels. Even if SCK didn't heal at all, you can still push out huge green numbers like crazy. This nerf was aimed at the higher levels.
Reply Quote
90 Blood Elf Monk
6680
I will admit It was mildly op for leveling,however, monk healing is just over powered in general for leveling. I shouldn't have done 1M healing overall at level 59 in a wsg game.
Reply Quote

Please report any Code of Conduct violations, including:

Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.

Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.

Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.

Forums Code of Conduct

Report Post # written by

Reason
Explain (256 characters max)
Submit Cancel

Reported!

[Close]