10/20/2012 12:39 AMSince you've noticed my lack of experience in Arena and RBG, I'm pretty sure you'd also notice that I played this warrior back in Catacylsm when warriors were a god awful class, meaning that criticizing me for being "fotm" doesn't actually make sense.
Posted by Durar
actually, it does make sense. FotM characters don't have to be characters that you simply leveled as soon as you found out they were OP. they can be alts you had sitting around and maybe had at max level in the past xpac and wanted to get to max level this xpac in order to take advantage of the current OP state.
in other words, he was pointing out that because of your lack of experience that you're probably a FotM player. whether that's true or not is irrelevant because you'll deny it either way and use the fact that you played this character in Cata when warriors were "god awful" which isn't even true.
on a side note, you've been in almost every mage thread on this forum for about 2 days now. constantly posting on the threads claiming that mages are sad they aren't gods or some ignorant drivel like that. tell me, what looks more pathetic from the outside looking in? a mage talking to other mages about nerfs that don't fix the actual problem with the class, or a warrior who seems to have a hard on ever since the nerfs were released? so much of one, in fact, that he spent days in the mage forums, posting the same thing multiple times to simply get a response in which he proceeded to talk down to that mage as if the mage was inferior to him in intelligence. if you want to talk logic, i'd say the warrior is the most pathetic.. logically.