World of Warcraft®

Oh so that's why you can't read for !@#$.

It was also mentioned in ts, but you're too much of an idiot to figure that out.

Me being terrible is why yourself and the useless rogue did squat while your fc was being chain cc'd all the way to the horde flag. That makes sense.

You talk alot about needing alli fcs, yet you won't spec prot & fc on your alli warr.

Ya, you talk alot.

You blow weiner for a living and i see its affecting your gameplay. Either quit that or the 49 bracket so we can have better games, thx.

11/29/2012 10:36 PMPosted by Stûd

u swallow m8

not enough that rubiks has to carry you in-game, now you're gonna make him carry your forum arguments ...sheesh
good thing he's got big shoulders, respectable big shoulders

You talk alot about needing alli fcs, yet you won't spec prot & fc on your alli warr.

You talk alot about needing alli fcs, yet you won't spec prot & fc on your alli warr.

I do have a prot fc set/spec. I just choose not to go prot because ally always has 2-3 prot warr/pallys each game, so why add to that? Every warr/pally that goes prot dps makes 49s horrible, that and when there are 3+ spriests on one team. Appreciate the report though.

Hey gang,

I'm thinking about rolling a 49 druid and was just wondering how they fair in this bracket? Was also thinking about maybe a shaman and how they go (will be rolling elemental/resto)?

Cheers
BSurv

Hey gang,

I'm thinking about rolling a 49 druid and was just wondering how they fair in this bracket? Was also thinking about maybe a shaman and how they go (will be rolling elemental/resto)?

Cheers
BSurv

Hey gang,

I'm thinking about rolling a 49 druid and was just wondering how they fair in this bracket? Was also thinking about maybe a shaman and how they go (will be rolling elemental/resto)?

Cheers
BSurv

i think pretty much anything in this bracket can be pretty viable if it's played properly