Multi-Game Modes and Server Types? Practical.

90 Gnome Rogue
6585
This is practical, if you cannot do paragraphs, copy and paste each sentence into one line.

Do this,tell me your opinions, no doubt congregations of people succeed through teamwork.
Reply Quote
90 Gnome Rogue
6585
This is not a new rule set.

This is a diminuation of class roles. Generalization of spells. Scaled Difficulty/ Leveling Rates, none of these change anything about the code.

Changing gearing/itemization/ leveling rates/monster difficulty are simply scaling, and allowing for redundancy. This is similar to Diablo 3. There is no difference between Normal and Inferno modes save for the difficulty of monsters, and the armor that drops, more or less.
Reply Quote
02/07/2013 12:56 AMPosted by Lecithin
wow is old news, macho man randy savage would stomp on it for fun. What points weren't clear, i tried to put each concise idea into a paragraph. Go to school.


He didnt say he didn't understand it, he said it was needlessly wordy, and it is. It is not concise AT ALL. You could have simply said the same thing in one fing sentance:

"Allow me to slow my xp gain so I can enjoy the game at a more organic pace, because at the current pace it feels too much like a hack 'n slash."

See how small that sentance is?

Compare with your enormous post.

Yes, it was needlessly wordy. Far too needlessly wordy.
Reply Quote
100 Dwarf Mage
11375
I feel like the OP is perpetually angry at everything.
Reply Quote
90 Gnome Rogue
6585
HAVE AT YE SWABS!
Reply Quote
90 Gnome Rogue
6585
Choon you are correct, i have much anger and fury about me, uncontrollable key clacking rage.
Good work Aladster, you are more concise than i can prove to be.

Also, slower xp rate, more difficulty from stage 1, universal spellbooks/classes, allowing people to chose their spec/class/talents from just leveling and skill trees rather than have a rigid class system enforcing the same things over and over again.

There would be much more versatility if every player could build a spec around whatever spells they like, rather than pidgeonholed into a base class and picking 6 abilities.
Reply Quote
100 Undead Rogue
6200
02/08/2013 11:21 AMPosted by Lecithin
HAVE AT YE SWABS!

^
Troll
Reply Quote
90 Dwarf Shaman
7745
You are aware you're asking Blizzard to reengineer the game in it's entity.
Reply Quote
100 Blood Elf Priest
13945
Leaving aside the fact that it's never going to happen, OP fails to understand that min-maxers and theorycrafters don't want simple and easy. We're playing a metagame, and we don't want that dumbed down any more than you want the actual game dumbed down.

You can't get rid of us; the same depth that attracts you is what draws us in as well.
Reply Quote
90 Gnome Warrior
13000
Geesh. This poor dead horse. How many ways can one say 'vanilla servers' without being obvious? Zero.
Reply Quote
97 Undead Warlock
9920
in what universe is developing for and maintaining 4+ different games with entirely different rulesets considered practical?
Reply Quote
90 Gnome Rogue
6585
It's just a different game mode my man, playing capture the flag can easily be done by making twin peaks and WSG just cross in the middle, make each base flag a node protection hub, and there's another EOTS. It's easy to change rulesets, far simpler than the game mechanics...
Reply Quote
90 Worgen Priest
7065
In case no one noticed from another thread it spewed it's rhetoric in, this gnome druid is insane and needlessly obsessive.

Do not converse or acknowledge.
Edited by Morrice on 2/10/2013 3:33 AM PST
Reply Quote

Please report any Code of Conduct violations, including:

Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.

Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.

Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.

Forums Code of Conduct

Report Post # written by

Reason
Explain (256 characters max)

Reported!

[Close]