05/12/2013 12:01 PMYea because getting the achievement at level 25 with triple fff back in the day is way more legit than getting it at level 7 with 3 uncommons. Keep in mind that either side probably can't offer up proof that their achievement is legit. There have been various other comps at max level that make this achievement laughable at best. Food comas, chews and Blighthawks to name a few.
Posted by Hearus
No need to get your little panties in a bunch, there.
You're reaching pretty far trying to discredit anyone who did it in a far harder bracket than the one you chose. Even so far as to try to call people liars simply because you're offended.
Also, I don't even have any of the pets that you just mentioned learned in my pet journal, so I can at least "prove" that much that I didn't use those teams. I've never even owned them.
I didn't question your level 7 team. Why, is there something you're not telling us about your wins? I'm often told that those who see the most deceit are often the ones who have most to hide.
I got my achieve at the tail end of 5.1 (yes, fighting against triple FFF teams, Conflag bombing, etc) w/ a Blizzard comp (Frosty, Tiny Snowman, KLR). I've got no reason to lie about it.
Ah well, this isn't the first time we've disagreed. I'm certain it won't be the last. I'll leave you to keep stomping your feet and shouting that your method was "just as good", I suppose.
If you pvp long enough in any game you will here the phrase "yea you did x but you used y to do it so it doesn't really count." over and over. Your sour grapes is just another variation of this. No level is more legit no comp is more legit, the achievement is what it is.
This sounds awfully reminiscent of "but but but, triple FFFs and Food Comas, blah blah".
Level 7 pet battle PvP can barely be considered PvP. If you pvp long enough, you'd know that. But you don't even have 30 PvP wins, so I don't expect you do.