Post History for Gleipdonir#2724

Red border should be thicker, agreed. And while we are on it: why no yellow (or purple?) border for ancient items? No border = "normal" legsYellow/purple borders = ancientRed = PrimalJust a suggestion

Agreed, did a 107 GR with Gargs. Pretty mediocre Augments and around 100 gems. And i bascially needed 10ish trys for that. My suggestion: make Pets CC immune (cannot be frozen nor knockbacked etc.). It would still be pretty hard, since gargs easily lose focus on mobile enemies.

They are probably exaggerating like always when it comes down to D3.IMO, in all these years, there was just one honest post/words: "...we won't be making any new Diablo announcements" - Nevalistis, 27. Sept 2017, before BlizzCon.

Bought it today and played it for 45 min. it looks pretty good. Nice game feeling. Right now, I am lvl 5. I am looking forward to the next levels :)

11/18/2018 06:35 AMPosted by KushiSensei11/18/2018 06:27 AMPosted by Gleipdonir......IMO you guys are deceived by the fact that more classes don't automatically mean more context or builds. I think D3 doesnt need another class. But D3 needs a balancing patch to equalize all existing sets (and therefore playstyles!).Think of it: Adding one more class will get us probably 1(!) more playable set because all the others are underperforming. Plus, maybe the new character wont fit into group play.What D3 really need is diversity, which can be achieved by balancing all existing sets and characters. So…

11/18/2018 06:18 AMPosted by SuedomsaAmazon and Druid together would be just fine by me, I was thinking that going to happen at Blizzcon.11/18/2018 03:34 AMPosted by Fetoid Another expansion too perhaps? That would be exciting. Okay.Thanks for your awesome work!IMO you guys are deceived by the fact that more classes don't automatically mean more context or builds. I think D3 doesnt need another class. But D3 needs a balancing patch to equalize all existing sets (and therefore playstyles!).Think of it: Adding one more class will get us probably 1(!) more playable set because all the others are …

11/07/2018 03:06 PMPosted by NevalistisWe want to start by saying we hear you. Since the moment we stepped into the office on Monday, we have been discussing everything Diablo non-stop. We’re fully committed to listening and engaging—so please keep the constructive feedback coming. Our primary focus right now is poring over that feedback to inform internal discussions, and we’ll follow up with further thoughts as soon as we can.In all honesty, the "we hear you" can not be beaten by audacity! (I hope thats the correct english phrase). Since years WE are talking, writing and testing on PTR. But …

New Class (Druid) without balancing will be useless. Instead of a new class, balancing ALL SETS would have given more diversity than just adding another unbalaned hero (where you can probably play just 1 set if you want to run higher GRs)Do you really think that Blizzard is capable of balancing all the sets NOW? They failed in the past and with another class it will be even harder.

IMO the big problem are knockback/stun/freeze effects, which just makes your gargs completely useless. Right now, you have to avoid/skip too many elites due to their abilities. I'd say just add invulnerability to your pets by default for those things and test how this would work out. Then just add a (slightly) dmg buff to be on par with Necro pets.

02/10/2018 02:22 PMPosted by lightstormThis banwave sure doesnt seem to be systematically done, it seems like someone from the hacks team was bored and hand picked a couple of high profile accounts during his lunch break.Better than nothing i guess...True. And please, if a group lacks 1+ players, the whole record should be erased from the LB. No one is interested in records where at least 1 player was cheating/botting.