100 is my personal best and I don't really have much interest in going higher. I play solo, so I don't have to worry about what other people want me to play.Your problem is that your playstyle mandates that you play with other people and that guarantees only a bad experience. This is not a multiplayer game. It's a single-player, online-only game with multiplayer support.If you want a fun game that you can play for hundreds of hours with other people, I can recommend another game.

I'm just surprised that they didn't know that there would be backlash. Seems like the people running the show couldn't be more detached from gaming.Diablo2: *Wildly successful*Blizz: "So guys. Let's just throw a bunch of crap into a hat and press it into a game. Honestly, what is Diablo anyways? I never got it. Is it some kind of anti-Christian thing? Whatever. I read somewhere that people are looking for a sequel, so let's just get this one out."*literally everybody buys it*Fans: "WTF is this? Are every one of these character lines Disney throw-aways? Why is the entire game extremely easy unt…

Not sure why this thread is still going. There should be no confusion in this.1 key press = 1 action. Actions are defined as being a unit of work that can be accomplished by one key press on standard hardware.You know what that action is, so if you have to do some mental gymnastics to make it mean something like being able to run an entire level on a button press, or activating an ability twice, that's not allowed.If you have something set up to activate a skill twice while you only press once, that's automation. It's not supported. It's against the rules of the ToS, or ToU, or whatever dictat…

06/30/2019 01:05 PMPosted by LazyTurtleTell that to Darkpatator who is a EU player who adamantly uses macros, and has never had any action against him/her.I recall that there was probably only one time when they actually banned people for using them. I can guarantee that people have been using them since.

Considering he left Blizzard in like 2014, I suspect that he won't.

Never liked shooters. Don't see any fun in them. Of course, that's Blizzard's cue to restart the game.The original developers of Diablo tried to make a shooter version of Diablo. Didn't go well.

I completed GR 100 recently. I haven't augmented, but I think at this point, there's nothing left but redundancy.There's always a bigger dog out there, no matter how high you go, except at the very top, where RNG has blessed the fool with a far more perfect run than you'll ever have.I have never seen the value in the leaderboards, except to give you an excuse to put more time into the game than you wanted to.I'm not saying these people are not more skilled than I. They are. I just don't feel like being more skilled in the game equates to more fun.

Probably pays $300k/yr... just enough to be on welfare in CA.

06/13/2019 09:13 AMPosted by KarishinLook at you acting like you are smart.I'm wrong often enough to see it as a normal scenario. I'm at peace with that.In my profession, I'm allowed to be wrong as many times as I want, but I only need to be right once before my work is always right.My scenario lacks real numbers. I didn't care enough to look for the gemstone's drop chance and I don't know how to find Diablo3's player population. I can say, however, that the population on the leaderboards is guaranteed, meaning there definitely isn't less than that population.Finally, "smart" is not a high bar…

Because of class guarantees and set complications, the probabilities are extremely difficult to calculate. I would suspect, though, that at least one person gets a streak like that per season minus the primal thing, which makes it (1/400)*6 less likely.