Resurrect. Bring back Malygos. Always. Even if it didn’t die or isn’t in your deck.

02/26/2019 01:42 PMPosted by blackveiled02/26/2019 12:40 PMPosted by MarcoscongasSo I was right! I suspected this had nothing to do with balance but about you wanting Warlock to have the monopoly on big minions while removing your bad matchups from Priest, Hunter, and Rogue.Of course you also want to throw Shadow Visions under the bus since why not nerf Reno too, another tough Warlock matchup.Are you seriously implying I wrote this thread for the sole purpose of whining about "my counter"?Renolock has no access to things such as Mass Hysteria or Psychic Scream. Cube Hunter and Tempo Mage can …

At ranks 2 to 1, I hardly see Barnes. Wish I saw him more often to be honest. It’s everything else that I see. Especially even shaman. You’d think after nerfing flametongue totem you’d see less, I’m not seeing that trend at all.

Upgrade for five mana and only those secrets in hand. Won’t see play.

@Mand--No disagreement that Genn and Baku are problematic. But, I do disagree on the rationale. If you re-read Whalen's explanation, it was about basically winning the game once you play the Hero because its hero power produced such overwhelming advantages that your opponent couldn't answer. The inherent strength of the hero power also made it such that you didn't need to provide a supporting cast of cards. It literally was a standalone win condition. That's not the case in either Genn or Baku for at least two reasons. First, they have activation requirements that limits your ability to constr…

02/06/2019 08:48 AMPosted by TheRiddlerI tend to agree that the people saying that the changes to Classic cards are all about "money" are stretching more than the love-child of Reed Richards and Plastic Man. The labyrinthine twists in logic such people make to try and establish a reason why a change to a classic card somehow = more pack sales is like trying to understand the argument of the Underpants Gnomes.I honestly think giving away a few thousand dust at the start of each 'year' would be a very nice thing to doYou mean like how they're giving everyone free dust and gold with the New Year…

Let’s make this very simple to understand. Change to make things fun is OK. Change to make things better is OK. Change to make things interesting is OK. BUT Change due to greed IS NOT OK. All of the so called balance patches haven’t made things better; they haven’t made things more fun. And certainly they haven’t made the game any more interesting. All the changes have done is marginalize the players’ investment in the name of the obscure rationale of freeing up design space, another term for compelled expansion purchases. This isn’t a matter of adapting. We all adapt every time a patch or exp…

Not going to debate the need for a rotation of classic or basic as that’s an entirely separate can of worms. But, the whole tired excuse of “free up design” space makes me wonder exactly what designs would break under these cards? Blizzard’s silence in backing up how these cards impinge their creative process is deafening. This just forces people to buy expansions because their initial investment into the classic set now has less and less value and relevance in the meta. For the first time, I will not preorder the next expansion. I will not spend cash. I will only use gold and dust. If I don’…

01/30/2019 05:14 AMPosted by splintertwin...Are you purposefully being obtuse? Or is my writing unclear?I gave examples that worked against Big Priest. That doesn't mean those examples are the only exclusive answers to Big Priest. Other archetypes, including Mill, counter Big Priest as well. Please read beyond the topic sentence before you make remarks that border on idiocy. And, what's wrong with the aggro approach against Big Priest? By your admission, aggro does counter Big priest which means it's weak to many different decks. So, doesn't that suggest that Big priest is actually balanced? L…

01/29/2019 05:49 PMPosted by splintertwin01/29/2019 01:35 PMPosted by Balmain...Let’s not get it twisted. I didn’t say Big priest is fine solely because of kB rogue. I gave an example of a decktype that Big priest is weak against. I also highlighted pirate warrior. Virtually any deck that relies on a balanced distribution of early board threats and weapons or spells for reach will force Big priest to cave. It’s a do nothing for at least four turns deck. So if you can exploit that weakness you can win. Further Big priest also dies to Mill. Are those enough examples for you to comprehend? And l…