01/23/2018 11:31 PMPosted by XeneoxThe only reason the OW heroes are in this game is just advertisement.You're saying that the only reason they spent however many hours on every single Overwatch hero is so that they could run a year long campaign to advertise Overwatch League a year from then? They couldn't have just put them in because literally every single other game on the launcher has characters in the game?01/24/2018 01:20 AMPosted by SartezzAmen Brother. In the light of Warcraft, Diablo and Starcraft, heroes from Overwatch look like a joke made for children.The Overwatch heroes use guns…

How do you know there aren't enough programmers?

01/21/2018 03:39 PMPosted by NarhaIt would spread your team out too far and make it even worse on the team that has the weaker waveclear/solo laners. Also Abathur would become King and they'd need to add another viking to The Lost Vikings2 lane maps clump your team up too much and make it worse on the team that has weaker teamfight strength. Also Abathur would become worse and they'd need to remove a Viking from The Lost Vikings.Good thing there's no 2 lane maps to change up any team compositions.

12/19/2017 11:11 PMPosted by Sumnayin12/19/2017 08:08 PMPosted by PiximaeTeam leader doesn't mean absolutely anything in terms of actual game play. Unless you are taking the bull by the horns and giving bad play advice...Or unless you're playing QM in which case, it happens. Long lose streaks followed up with long win streak.Actually it means highest MMR on the team and decides who bans heroes. Which is what he meant. Are you serious?Actually I don't think that's ever referred to as anything other than "Your pick", and it's completely unneccessary information since it doesn't matter who picks …

Maybe you're a bad leader if you consistently lose when you lead.

12/19/2017 05:24 PMPosted by KOLI can't believe how hateful and hurtful you and some other people are on this thread. I'm sure you'll fit in with the other toxic downvoters here, after all, there is always a good reason to downvote.....Oh, wait.So you have one of two arguments here:1) Downvoting for content is a valid reason to downvote and you're highlighting that (Unlikely given the tone of the last two words)2) There is never a good reason for downvoting because content or the individual creating it are the only two reasons you could have for downvoting something. Which leads into an intere…

12/19/2017 05:02 PMPosted by MekkaGooOh, wait.I think you're confused, you should click on his name to see the full quote.

It does.https://gfycat.com/ExaltedIdolizedFeline