"Balanced"

General Discussion
09/30/2018 06:21 PMPosted by CrazyLegs
@MCHammer

Don't respond to Arms31312. He's a troll who uses sophistry to endlessly argue with people. Just report him and move on.


I'm sorry that you are taking things personally. But you posted false information on this post and it needs to be addressed. Just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean a ban is in order, like your other post implies.
here's a question:
What are your "air quotes" supposed to do alongside the number you posted?
Without a source or context, they could just be stuff you made up with the implication that you don't deem the results to be 'balanced'
However, expressing that much to you is already more work than you've put into thinking this crap through, so, should I really go on? Honestly no, since you didn't put effort into the crap you posted, you've not going to be effort into the replies people post, much the same as you didn't put effort into all the feedback people gave you on how to improve yourself to not be in the sort of position where you find yourself wasting your time doing stupid crap like posting numbers, and then pretending to yourself you didn't something worthwhile enough that any other naysay against your efforts is bunk.

So really, its just a cycle of lazy crap.

The functional issue with any stat is the context around it: people able to post a percent doesn't express when, how many, what level, play environment or the like, to which the basis not only begs the question "so what" but it also seems to ignore that the numbers may deviate from what blizz has to reference, at which point you seem to infer that your lazy copy/paste from above is somehow more involved than 'official' numbers and that evidently [blizz] couldn't reference those themselves, so obviously you are doing this great service by posting incredible resources without citation — which apparently went great for you back in school as they did a solid job of stressing the importance of all that wonderful stuff.

So either the context matters and that creates something more notable to analyze from the stastics — cuz surprise, surprise, numbers like that have causes and influences that may be involved for why the stat is as it is, and not just some hard-line conclusion that demands specific action accordingly.

However, none of what of any of that likely ever occurred to you as you've been ingrained to assume the wonder of the surface of the numbers — hence the copy/paste — and not the particulars about the analysis of them, which is why you didn't do anything else.

So congrats on this wonderful display of laziness and ignorance that was likely veiled to be a criticism of something that isn't [you] but can instead be used as a wonderful point of assumption to make such wonderful remarks about [you].

Isn't "balance" just dandy like that?
09/30/2018 09:14 PMPosted by Xenterex
here's a question:
What are your "air quotes" supposed to do alongside the number you posted?
Without a source or context, they could just be stuff you made up with the implication that you don't deem the results to be 'balanced'
However, expressing that much to you is already more work than you've put into thinking this crap through, so, should I really go on? Honestly no, since you didn't put effort into the crap you posted, you've not going to be effort into the replies people post, much the same as you didn't put effort into all the feedback people gave you on how to improve yourself to not be in the sort of position where you find yourself wasting your time doing stupid crap like posting numbers, and then pretending to yourself you didn't something worthwhile enough that any other naysay against your efforts is bunk.

So really, its just a cycle of lazy crap.

The functional issue with any stat is the context around it: people able to post a percent doesn't express when, how many, what level, play environment or the like, to which the basis not only begs the question "so what" but it also seems to ignore that the numbers may deviate from what blizz has to reference, at which point you seem to infer that your lazy copy/paste from above is somehow more involved than 'official' numbers and that evidently [blizz] couldn't reference those themselves, so obviously you are doing this great service by posting incredible resources without citation — which apparently went great for you back in school as they did a solid job of stressing the importance of all that wonderful stuff.

So either the context matters and that creates something more notable to analyze from the stastics — cuz surprise, surprise, numbers like that have causes and influences that may be involved for why the stat is as it is, and not just some hard-line conclusion that demands specific action accordingly.

However, none of what of any of that likely ever occurred to you as you've been ingrained to assume the wonder of the surface of the numbers — hence the copy/paste — and not the particulars about the analysis of them, which is why you didn't do anything else.

So congrats on this wonderful display of laziness and ignorance that was likely veiled to be a criticism of something that isn't [you] but can instead be used as a wonderful point of assumption to make such wonderful remarks about [you].

Isn't "balance" just dandy like that?


tldr

Join the Conversation

Return to Forum