what the shift is this

@Loltralisk has it all right. "These buffs are nerfs!"I don't understand what the uproar is about - The changes are almost all solid. Blink DTs are probably going to be a bit too good but so are almost all the Terran changes. This is going to just change how the game is played which is good.

When you have a race that A-Clicks 90 percent of their units for maximum efficiency, against a race that has to carefully micro 90 percent of their units for maximum efficiency, it feels wrong. Terran is certainly under-performing in AM and KR tournaments. Terrans certainly go into those tournaments in numbers - equal to Protoss and Zerg. And they win substantially! They're the best in the world after all. But the difference between lategame Protoss and lategame Terran has never been more visible at all levels.Zergs are having an equally tough time against Protoss but in mid and lategame Zerg …

Actually this is sort of a big deal. I hadn't really thought about it much but Terran invests just as much as a Zerg when building a depot - lost mining time, leaving workers vulnerable, while not being able to build/replace workers as fast as Z.

Terran can not win tournies in Korea.At the lower levels Terran demands higher skill level play than both P and Z (Protoss will tell you over and over APM isn't an indication of skill level and Z will tell you not to let the game go to lategame if you want to win).Terran's in the worst spot it's ever been in SC2 history.This sounds bleak and other race players will call it QQ but you've gotta outplay or get lucky to win as Terran. In an even skilled game the odds are against you as Terran.

I have been playing exclusively Heroes Of The Storm for about 6 months now. I've got nearly 3,000 career games at Terran between this and a separate account, was Rank 1 Diamond at best but never Master.I'm sure my gameplay could be improved drastically in a lot of ways.I was venting to a friend earlier this week about how as a Terran player, I just do not even give a damn about this game anymore. How many Terran winners have their been in Premier or Major tournaments in all of 2016? Like, four? Maybe? And NEVER in a Korean environment where the skill is highest - the winners of those tournamen…

It actually would be op as hell. Removes half of the risk of tanks.

TIL that KR players are just as big QQers as AM players are.

08/14/2013 12:00 AMPosted by HechNoOracle needs some serious fixing. Right now it's just a gimmicky and reliant-on-your-opponent-being-bad unit.I couldn't agree more, but alas, we must work with what we have, as we all know that no unit is going to completely revamped until LOTV, so we must keep it simple and elegant, as in moving around the numbers in the best way possible.

Taken from a thread that my idea was edited into the OP of another very good post on the forum, definitely worth a read.http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/9628663269The first part about the Oracle itself was written by the author of said post, the bottom three balance changes with their suggestions was mine.I think my proposed ideas (with appropriate testing and much more qualified people writing the numbers behind said changes) would greatly enhance the Oracle, and would make it a fully versatile, strong unit.Oracle The oracle in my opinion is the biggest failure of HoTS. Blizzard hoped …