Leenock and Live make ZvT look childish.

Terran Discussion
Leenock and Life go 16-5 versus Terran while the rest of Zerg in group play go 12-21. The games Leenock and life won weren't close and the games they lost were very close. Its really nice to finally see some good zerg players. Here is hoping that this game finally get balanced.

P.s. You can QQ infestors OP all you want, but Leenock's innovation (TLO style nydus/drop play and muta play) and Life's zergling control/harass are the reason why they tiers above the other zerg.
I think this sums it up

http://i.imgur.com/DrgMn.jpg

and

3:35

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3gL9foSB0E&list=UU-teGPup3KKf9hoAg5yJk8Q&index=7&feature=plcp
Just now there are good zergs? i guess you haven't heard of nestea or drg, you know, they been winning stuff for a while...nestea not so much anymore but still 3 gsl titles...
I think this sums it up

http://i.imgur.com/DrgMn.jpg



ya thats not right.....why is a caster unit also the do everything unit. zerg need an additional tier 2 ground unit....or just make the hydralisk viable earlier...forgot the speed upgrade at hive, it should be at lair
I've got mad respect for Leenock, I love the way that kid plays. He doesn't rely on the boring way of doing it at all.

He's fun to watch and his games were great

Life on the other hand, he's a good player. But he's still abusing infestors.

I think this sums it up

http://i.imgur.com/DrgMn.jpg

and

3:35

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3gL9foSB0E&list=UU-teGPup3KKf9hoAg5yJk8Q&index=7&feature=plcp


That's it, I would just fire David kim at this point. No questions asked.

It's already well documented that he's like a full time Dota 2 player. He's not paying any attention to starcraft 2 at all.
11/05/2012 03:09 AMPosted by Terok
Just now there are good zergs? i guess you haven't heard of nestea or drg, you know, they been winning stuff for a while...nestea not so much anymore but still 3 gsl titles...


I honestly feel nestea and DRG are overrated. They play a very "standard" style which has kept zerg from evolving the way the other races have. People felt that "macro zerg" is the only way to play when in fact you dont need 100 drones to win a game.
11/05/2012 09:31 AMPosted by miclovin
Just now there are good zergs? i guess you haven't heard of nestea or drg, you know, they been winning stuff for a while...nestea not so much anymore but still 3 gsl titles...


I honestly feel nestea and DRG are overrated. They play a very "standard" style which has kept zerg from evolving the way the other races have. People felt that "macro zerg" is the only way to play when in fact you dont need 100 drones to win a game.


Evolving dude? You guys have evolved to the point where almost every agrees there is a major problem.
11/05/2012 09:36 AMPosted by llllllllllll


I honestly feel nestea and DRG are overrated. They play a very "standard" style which has kept zerg from evolving the way the other races have. People felt that "macro zerg" is the only way to play when in fact you dont need 100 drones to win a game.


Evolving dude? You guys have evolved to the point where almost every agrees there is a major problem.


I think a major problem is that blizzard doesn't listen to the community. They have an idea on how the game should be played and balance on that idea, rather than what the people who play the game want. An example would easily be that terran is the weakest race, but the tiny maps that blizzard had for the first two years favored early marines. Infantry got several nerfs AND the maps were made bigger, essentially double nerfing them. Now, with the buffs to queens, terran cannot get any early pressure. This forces them to build 3 command centers behind 1 marine while teching to banshees and pray that zerg only makes 4 lings and takes an expansion if you want to win.

Join the Conversation

Return to Forum