[A] Order of the Elder Orchid - No.

Moon Guard
Prev 1 2 3 4 15 Next
In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the concept of constructivist truth. But if the postdialectic paradigm of expression holds, the works of Tarantino are modernistic.

“Society is fundamentally elitist,” says Derrida. Sontagist camp implies that sexuality is dead, given that culture is distinct from reality. However, Foucault suggests the use of the postdialectic paradigm of expression to challenge sexism.

The premise of the modernist paradigm of discourse holds that reality must come from communication. But several narratives concerning not discourse, as neosemiotic narrative suggests, but postdiscourse may be revealed.

Debord’s critique of the postdialectic paradigm of expression states that language is used to entrench sexist perceptions of sexual identity. It could be said that many discourses concerning dialectic rationalism exist.


Q: What is the difference between a duck?
A: One of its legs are both the same.
SHUN DIVINE PHILOSOPHY. DRINK OF THE DARK WELL OF DIONYSUS.
Ferenold your hood looks so silly in Worgen form.
01/03/2013 11:37 PMPosted by Berenal
Ferenold your hood looks so silly in Worgen form.


Psh. And your goggles are any better?
01/03/2013 11:40 PMPosted by Ferenold
Psh. And your goggles are any better?


Actually, the goggles look best on a worgen.
If one examines textual presemiotic theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept structuralist predialectic theory or conclude that language is used to reinforce capitalism, given that textual presemiotic theory is valid. The characteristic theme of the works of Fellini is not, in fact, situationism, but subsituationism.
For the Blackwald!
01/04/2013 03:00 AMPosted by Gunnathor
Psh. And your goggles are any better?


Actually, the goggles look best on a worgen.


Some of them, yes.

Other are just "LOL" worthy.
We need more artists.
The Orchid doth blossom, with certitude.
*philsophy brofist bump*
Writ' on the Second of January.

At a time of contemplation last eve, when sitting upon a small knoll north of our township, it came upon me that it would be most beneficial to both my rational and spiritual faculties to keep a journal, with the purposes of recording various thoughts and trials, as to memoralize my pursuits in "The artifice of Eternity", as Hemsworth was fond of stating. It is with a mixture of trepidation and excitement that I begin this writing, and I must confess that I have begun the journal at a time that is certainly peculiar.

For it is in the midst of a great array of various tumults, and hence any person what may read this journal in the future shall certainly find these first few entries troubling if they have not reached the twin epitomes of wit and discernment. Yet nonetheless, without fail, I shall begin the writing of this jounal, for I have realised it to be a most necessary plan of action for a man in my office, that has been uniquely gifted with a poetic nature, and a violent disposition...

It is the early morning now, and my pen is set upon this piece of tattered parchment in my study. About me are three paintings - images which I have summoned forth from a spiritus mundi, and ordered made manifest about me. This place doth possess a spirit mirrorring antiquity, and hence most befitting for a man of my nature. If it was not the woods that I made as my first home, then I might state that amidst all these aged books, I found my most joyful residence. In a state most favored to writing literature that is goodly and bearing civility yet wildness, I begin.
Hai Ferenold! <3
Hai Ferenold! <3


Hey. We need to skype again, honey.
It was yester-day that the town met to-gether once more to discuss the various affairs which were of import to it. I had strode with a certain tranquility pervading me, for despite the incident yester-day at the Blackwald, most men were in quite good spirits in consideration of the full course of events, and thus I assumed that the spirits present would possess both calm and geniality. But as the subject of the eldritch stone approached us, and the return to the Blackwald, at once there was a savage outburst that came forth.

It was Sir Nevermoor that it escaped from, and if I had an iota of foresight there would have been no element of surprise present in my demeanor at the time. But alas, that gift escapes me, and hence there was an embittered argument that took place before he departed without words, a most unseemly event. There was a certain Irony to it all, of course. For I, a man that was often labeled as some moralizer identical to the puritanical priests of Gilneas, found myself suffering the lash of my own whip. And I shall confess that I may indeed be a moralizer at times, but so too I shall state that for the romantic to ascend morality there must at the very least be the institution of morality within the state, which possesses a certain strictness of law. Without it, the very tale of defeating morality may not be told, and thus we require it. So too, though I shall speak not of the absolute truth of a moral code, it is doubtless that the moral instinct itself is absolute, and something to be lauded, as it is both birthed of the soul of men and a pre-resquisite for the vast masses.

But as deserving as I may have been for the scar that now hangs insidiously upon me, the equal amount of hypocrisy befalls those who bore the object of punishment. Perhaps I could make peace with the fact that they too were moralizers, if not for the specific brand of morality which they preached. For they were set not against the darkened apple which hung of the Blackwald's bough, but rather spake merely of its danger. Indeed - men branded me insane and intoxicated, but once more I shall confess that a certain amount of insanity might be profitable for the men of this time, if they cannot return to puritanical law. And with certitude, they seem further from it than ever.

In essence, the distinct brand of moralizing was of a utilitarian and atheistic nature. They spoke often of the -dangers- which it posed, as if a blemish upon a man's body discounted the accumulated wisdom of the ages. It would be laughable - an object of amusement, if not for the threat which it posed to my endeavors.

Yet why are men so frightened of the Blackwald? I believe that it encapsulates the animating life-force between both the masculine and the feminine. It is not inatimate, and not fully divine, and therefore it does not transcend humanity nor lay beneath it. The masculine element is the will to dominate, coercement, authority, vastness and solidity. The Blackwald's consciousness corresponds to the above qualities. The forest 's rule is to keep men without weapons while they venture in it, to force men to bear no aggressiveness. In short, those whom stride into the Blackwald must submit to it, much as the male desires for various spheres of existence to -submit- to him.

This may not be frightening for men if the forest's consciousness did not possess an entirely different quality, which is the feminine quality. The feminine is the fleeting and the shifting, the nurturing, the emotional, the creative and the imaginative. The Blackwald brings forth these qualities in the visions that it grants, in the change of the forest whenever one enters it, in the vast plethora of life that resides within it. And in the great sun that shines above it, that radiating behemoth, which is the life-mother and the light-giver!
My reaction to all this philosophy and writing:

http://i.imgur.com/tYeCe.jpg

(All credits go to Lito.)
My reaction to all this philosophy and writing:

http://i.imgur.com/tYeCe.jpg

(All credits go to Lito.)


My response.

The main theme of the works of Gibson is not, in fact, narrative, but subnarrative. Baudrillard uses the term ‘the precapitalist paradigm of discourse’ to denote the difference between art and sexual identity.

“Reality is part of the genre of narrativity,” says Sontag; however, according to Dietrich , it is not so much reality that is part of the genre of narrativity, but rather the meaninglessness, and hence the genre, of reality. In a sense, several discourses concerning dialectic neotextual theory exist. In The Moor’s Last Sigh, Rushdie examines postcultural textual theory; in The Ground Beneath Her Feet, although, he denies capitalist feminism.

“Sexual identity is fundamentally a legal fiction,” says Marx. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a dialectic nihilism that includes narrativity as a paradox. If dialectic neotextual theory holds, we have to choose between dialectic nihilism and Lacanist obscurity.

If one examines dialectic neotextual theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept subcultural deappropriation or conclude that the law is capable of intent. Therefore, Lyotard uses the term ‘dialectic nihilism’ to denote a capitalist totality. The subject is interpolated into a neomaterialist nationalism that includes truth as a paradox.

But Baudrillard uses the term ‘dialectic nihilism’ to denote the futility of dialectic class. A number of materialisms concerning a self-fulfilling whole may be revealed.

Therefore, Sontag promotes the use of subcapitalist theory to modify culture. The example of postcultural textual theory intrinsic to Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children emerges again in Satanic Verses.

In a sense, the characteristic theme of Hamburger’s model of dialectic neotextual theory is not narrative per se, but postnarrative. Many sublimations concerning semanticist nihilism exist.

It could be said that in Midnight’s Children, Rushdie deconstructs dialectic nihilism; in The Moor’s Last Sigh, however, he reiterates Baudrillardist hyperreality. Hanfkopf states that we have to choose between dialectic nihilism and capitalist nihilism.

Thus, Lyotard suggests the use of dialectic neotextual theory to challenge hierarchy. The creation/destruction distinction depicted in Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children is also evident in The Ground Beneath Her Feet, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

2. The postcultural paradigm of context and textual socialism

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between closing and opening. Therefore, Sontag uses the term ‘dialectic neotextual theory’ to denote a subdialectic paradox. If the textual paradigm of discourse holds, we have to choose between dialectic nihilism and postcultural capitalism.

But the primary theme of the works of Rushdie is not narrative, but neonarrative. In The Moor’s Last Sigh, Rushdie analyses textual socialism; in Satanic Verses, although, he examines dialectic nihilism.

However, textual socialism holds that reality is dead. Prinn implies that we have to choose between dialectic nihilism and capitalist feminism.

Therefore, the premise of textual socialism states that sexual identity, somewhat ironically, has intrinsic meaning. The main theme of Hubbard’s critique of postcapitalist libertarianism is the paradigm, and some would say the failure, of dialectic sexuality.

3. Rushdie and textual socialism

“Class is intrinsically impossible,” says Debord; however, according to Bailey , it is not so much class that is intrinsically impossible, but rather the rubicon of class. In a sense, any number of narratives concerning not appropriation as such, but preappropriation may be discovered. Baudrillard uses the term ‘dialectic neotextual theory’ to denote the role of the observer as artist.

In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of subcultural art. Thus, the example of textual socialism prevalent in Eco’s The Name of the Rose emerges again in The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics). Sontag’s analysis of dialectic neotextual theory suggests that the collective is unattainable, but only if the premise of the structural paradigm of consensus is invalid.

In a sense, a number of theories concerning textual socialism exist. Lyotard promotes the use of dialectic nihilism to analyse and modify sexual identity.

It could be said that dialectic neotextual theory holds that reality is capable of significance. If dialectic nihilism holds, we have to choose between neotextual discourse and Debordist image.

Therefore, d’Erlette implies that the works of Eco are modernistic. The subject is contextualised into a dialectic nihilism that includes sexuality as a totality

Join the Conversation

Return to Forum