Horde capital after the siege of Orgrimmar

Story Forum
I think they will make Orgrimmar entirely into a raid. Meaning, Orgrimmar will no longer be the capitol of the Horde. Where should they go and who will take the mantle of Warcheif after the death of Garrash Hellscream?

I am personally rooting for Baine and Thunder Bluff.
Pahaha.

Yeah right. Like Blizzard would alter their precious status-quo that much.
Orgrimmar isn't going to lose it's city status. It creates way too many gameplay problems. I wouldn't be surprised if most of the raid took place below Org, and the top part was just the opening sequence/few bosses.

As to who should be warchief, anyone but Baine. The guy couldn't lead himself over a cattle grid.
Then the horde couldn't use the resource excuse the next time they want a war.
02/25/2013 02:47 AMPosted by Gandred
Orgrimmar isn't going to lose it's city status. It creates way too many gameplay problems.


Like what?

Blizzard would need to move some NPC's. That's about it.

As for questing? Just phase it out for everybody 90 and above.

02/25/2013 02:54 AMPosted by Lena
Then the horde couldn't use the resource excuse the next time they want a war.


Why would the Horde losing their capitol not result in a resource shortage?

Of course, it might not be a problem if they moved into, say, Un'goro.
Like what?

Blizzard would need to move some NPC's. That's about it.

As for questing? Just phase it out for everybody 90 and above.


Uh, the imbalance of cities between Alliance and Horde?
Why would the Horde losing their capitol not result in a resource shortage?

Of course, it might not be a problem if they moved into, say, Un'goro.


Because only orcs have a resource shortage, if they were relocated they'd be better off.
02/25/2013 03:43 AMPosted by Gandred
Uh, the imbalance of cities between Alliance and Horde?


02/25/2013 03:36 AMPosted by Veloran
Of course, it might not be a problem if they moved into, say, Un'goro.
Plus, Orgrimmar is a giant deathhole. With Garrosh's recent 'upgrades' the city can get so hot that Baine couldn't made it from the gates to the throne room without collapsing, if not for his water supplies.

And given Orgrimmar has no available, easy-access source of water...
02/25/2013 03:53 AMPosted by Veloran
Uh, the imbalance of cities between Alliance and Horde?


Of course, it might not be a problem if they moved into, say, Un'goro.


Which would require them to create an entirely new city from scratch, for a single faction.

Gameplay problem.
02/25/2013 03:43 AMPosted by Gandred
Uh, the imbalance of cities between Alliance and Horde?


first i think this is a poor reason, second, they could easily promote Bilgewater to a full city. imo they should do that anyway.
02/25/2013 03:55 AMPosted by Gandred
Gameplay problem.


AND faction bias claims.

''The Orcs get a new City and the Alliance loose Theramore/Southshore with nothing in return? GG, Blizzard, this is OFFICALLY Hordecraft''

or something like that.
Orgrimmar won't be affected by the siege. The siege itself will be instanced, the in game city won't show any after affects of the siege and will remain the Horde capital.
Orgrimmar isn't going to lose it's city status. It creates way too many gameplay problems.


Like what?

Blizzard would need to move some NPC's. That's about it.

As for questing? Just phase it out for everybody 90 and above.

Then the horde couldn't use the resource excuse the next time they want a war.


Why would the Horde losing their capitol not result in a resource shortage?

Of course, it might not be a problem if they moved into, say, Un'goro.


Move some NPC's, redesign the entire Orcing starting zone, and if we're talking about moving the Orc's capital to an entirely new zone like Un'goro, they'd also have to redesign questing around all of the neighboring zones to create a smooth leveling experience.

And that's before even taking into account all the butt hurt this would cause for Horde players. No, too much work, too many worms in this can, not worth the effort.

AND faction bias claims.

''The Orcs get a new City and the Alliance loose Theramore/Southshore with nothing in return? GG, Blizzard, this is OFFICALLY Hordecraft''

or something like that.


Fair point, I hadn't even considered the butt hurt this would cause Alliance players as a previously disputed zone becomes entirely Horde to accommodate the new Horde starting zone. As an example, if they put the new Orc Capital in Hammerfall, they'd have to convert Arathi into a horde only starting zone, but they could merge the Orc questing line with the Forsakens after that.
02/25/2013 04:18 AMPosted by Banquiero
Orgrimmar won't be affected by the siege. The siege itself will be instanced, the in game city won't show any after affects of the siege and will remain the Horde capital.


Actually I'd be willing to bet at minimum we'll have Garrosh and any other casualties of the battle swapped out with the new Warchief and any associates.

There are a couple ways for Blizzard to go about doing this. My favorite would be to phase the city over when a character completes the Siege of Orgrimmar in any difficulty, then do it for all players upon hitting level 90 once patch 6.0 hits.
Pahaha.

Yeah right. Like Blizzard would alter their precious status-quo that much.
\

Because the Alliance players TOTALLY wouldn't complain if the Horde got a brand new capital city in lieu of Orgrimmar being potentially wiped out in lore or being set as always under siege outside of an instance.

The "Just Blizzard showing their favoritism again for world of Hordecraft" excuse can't work both ways in this situation. Orgrimmar will be fine after the raid or we'll be getting a new Orc capitol.

You're delusional if you think they'd allow an uneven number of active capital cities between the two factions.

Edit: Capital-capitol.
02/25/2013 08:59 AMPosted by Rageblades
I think Possibly Lor'Themar Theron, leader of the blood elves could become the new horde leader. Even if he's not an orc I think he has positive potential as an active and main leader in lore.


Finally update Azuremyst and Quel'thalas?
Which would require them to create an entirely new city from scratch, for a single faction.

Gameplay problem.


Ah, but you forget - It would be for the Horde. The Orcs specifically.

I'm pretty sure Blizzard would get it done for them.

02/25/2013 04:04 AMPosted by Ximothy
''The Orcs get a new City and the Alliance loose Theramore/Southshore with nothing in return? GG, Blizzard, this is OFFICALLY Hordecraft''


Dalaran.

02/25/2013 04:19 AMPosted by Dorcy
Move some NPC's, redesign the entire Orcing starting zone, and if we're talking about moving the Orc's capital to an entirely new zone like Un'goro, they'd also have to redesign questing around all of the neighboring zones to create a smooth leveling experience.


02/25/2013 03:36 AMPosted by Veloran
As for questing? Just phase it out for everybody 90 and above.
02/25/2013 03:36 AMPosted by Veloran
Of course, it might not be a problem if they moved into, say, Un'goro.


The Founding of Un'goro?

Join the Conversation

Return to Forum