New Alliance 5.3 Title

Story Forum
Prev 1 2 3 20 Next
People's ideas of breaking the Horde is much different then what should happen.
yesssss

alliance players get 'Hordebreaker'

horde players get 'Oathbreaker'

twinsies

Legit we get Hordebreaker?

I now want 5.3
We break the horde by helping the horde rebellion which already broke the horde?
yesssss

alliance players get 'Hordebreaker'

horde players get 'Oathbreaker'

twinsies

Legit we get Hordebreaker?

I now want 5.3


Hordebreaker is real.

Oathbreaker isn't.
what did we instigate?
Isn't the Whole Modus Operendi in 5.3 for Alliance is that The SI:7 Is stirring the pot?
Theramore broke the Horde.

Garrosh broke the Horde.

Theramore = Alliance.

Garrosh = Horde.

The events that took place in the Alliance city broke the spirit of the Horde due to Warchief Garrosh Hellscream's actions.

There you go. The Alliance and Garrosh broke the Horde.

Can I haz cookies?
Isn't the Whole Modus Operendi in 5.3 for Alliance is that The SI:7 Is stirring the pot?


in theory

in reality we didnt get the rebellion to fight garrosh any more than they would have, nor do we secure anything that we wouldnt have gotten otherwise
04/17/2013 06:06 PMPosted by Siast
What's wrong with Instigator?


what did we instigate?

vol'jin was already fighting garrosh, and the alliance doesnt do anything except tag along for the ride and do vol'jins chores

hordebreaker atleast has some 'oomph' to it


Bah.

I was looking forward to "Instigator Sybhyl." Creepy and cool.

"Hordebreaker Sybhyl" just sounds ridiculous to me. Not very warlocky. It's the kind of thing you'd expect a warrior to claim. A horde warrior at that.
"Hordebreaker Sybhyl" just sounds ridiculous to me. Not very warlocky. It's the kind of thing you'd expect a warrior to claim. A horde warrior at that.

I think "the Hordebreaker" sounds better, which is what the title is.

From mmo-champion:
Darkspear Rebellion now rewards the "The Hordebreaker" title.


http://www.mmo-champion.com/content/
http://ptr.wowdb.com/achievements/8306-hordebreaker#16837-16853
Well to people who dislike the title, what would you like?
Bah.

I was looking forward to "Instigator Sybhyl." Creepy and cool.

"Hordebreaker Sybhyl" just sounds ridiculous to me. Not very warlocky. It's the kind of thing you'd expect a warrior to claim. A horde warrior at that.


theres a warlock spec dedicated to mastering the ability to wantonly destroy things with fire

warlocks arent subtle

i dont think this is the class for you
04/17/2013 05:06 PMPosted by Cladriah
The Hordebreaker


Dat Title.

04/17/2013 06:13 PMPosted by Shmala
what did we instigate?
Isn't the Whole Modus Operendi in 5.3 for Alliance is that The SI:7 Is stirring the pot?


That is the modus operendi. It isn't actually what it looks like, as it looks like we're still just cowing down to Vol'jin.
Bah.

I was looking forward to "Instigator Sybhyl." Creepy and cool.

"Hordebreaker Sybhyl" just sounds ridiculous to me. Not very warlocky. It's the kind of thing you'd expect a warrior to claim. A horde warrior at that.


theres a warlock spec dedicated to mastering the ability to wantonly destroy things with fire

warlocks arent subtle

i dont think this is the class for you

Also, intigator doesn't mean it has to be subtle.

"A person who intentionally incites or starts something, especially one that starts trouble."
Nowhere does it say "subtly."
Bah.

I was looking forward to "Instigator Sybhyl." Creepy and cool.

"Hordebreaker Sybhyl" just sounds ridiculous to me. Not very warlocky. It's the kind of thing you'd expect a warrior to claim. A horde warrior at that.


theres a warlock spec dedicated to mastering the ability to wantonly destroy things with fire

warlocks arent subtle

i dont think this is the class for you


I hear some warlocks spec affliction.
Well to people who dislike the title, what would you like?


<name>, Lord of Kumbaya

<name>, the Carebear

<name>, orc-lover

Also, intigator doesn't mean it has to be subtle.

"A person who intentionally incites or starts something, especially one that starts trouble."


the title was awarded in the context of working for SI:7

subtlety and 'stirring the pot' are the themes behind it

I hear some warlocks spec affliction.


affliction warlocks are sadists to the core

they literally tear the souls out of their victims and send screaming ghosts into their victims to make them more susceptible to their spells of pain

not subtle
On the contrary, the affliction warlock destroys his enemy gradually and from within, and that is what is subtle about it. It's not hulk smash.
I hear some warlocks spec affliction.


Those people spam purple beams of death now. You're not subtle.

<name>, Lord of Kumbaya

<name>, the Carebear

<name>, orc-lover


I'm serious. They listened this much. If you don't like the title because it doesn't fit or sound right, go tweet Kosak for suggestions. Speak now or forever hold your QQ.
I prefer Hordebreaker to Instigator. I would have preferred SI:7 Operative.

But I would take NO Title in return for not working with Voljin and instead doing something that feels right for the Alliance, be it provoking Garrosh and Vol'jin into fighting each other, using their distraction to make a push at Lordaeron, or any other variety of things that feel like striking a blow for the Alliance instead of meekly helping the Horde take back their city because, once again, we are useless without a Horde leader to show us the way.
I won't use the title, but I don't really care for many titles in the game. There hasn't been one where I'm like, "MUST HAVE!"
We aren't breaking the horde though....we are helping them.

Join the Conversation

Return to Forum